Pohl, BJ

My feedback

  1. 38 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Pohl, BJ supported this idea  · 
  2. 41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Cost Management » Budgets + alerts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Pohl, BJ commented  · 

    This is a good idea. Similar idea with same result (don't want to dilute the ideas with a separate posting): Alert based on projected spend exceeding budget.

    Point is, the fixed % of budget is only so useful depending on when it is exceeded.

    Pohl, BJ supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cost Management » Budgets + alerts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Pohl, BJ supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Pohl, BJ shared this idea  · 
  5. 247 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Admin Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Pohl, BJ supported this idea  · 
  6. 54 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Automation » Hybrid  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. 180 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Automation » Webhooks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Pohl, BJ supported this idea  · 
  8. 275 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Automation » Bug  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Redeploying job schedule through ARM template needs a different jobschedule GUID. Even if you delete the job schedule , the GUID is retained in the database , hence a 2nd deployment will succeed only if the GUID is different.

    The scenarios where jobschedule GUID cannot be reused is as follows:

    1) The automation account is deleted before deleting the job schedule. The job schedule entry is soft deleted but is still present in the database.

    2) The automation account is created with the same name again and the same GUID is used for job schedule.

    We have identified as a bug & an improvement task is planned. We will pick this up as resourcing allows since this would need some changes in the architecture. As a workaround to this, pls update the GUID for jobSchedule.

    Pohl, BJ supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base