Darrin Dexheimer

My feedback

  1. 340 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Darrin Dexheimer supported this idea  · 
  2. 104 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  14 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Darrin Dexheimer supported this idea  · 
  3. 506 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darrin Dexheimer commented  · 

    This feature would be useful for inbound rules as well. One use case for this is restricting RDP access to "jump" boxes in a management subnet (this is part of a layered security approach of course). Ideally when home IPs change for the admin staff we wouldn't have to update the NSG rules as well. The DDNS agent would update public DNS within a few minutes and there would be no need to update the NSG. on a side note - the Az Firewall is too expensive :-)

    Perhaps there's an "Dynamic ASG" approach to this?

    Darrin Dexheimer supported this idea  · 
  4. 130 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  19 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Darrin Dexheimer supported this idea  · 
  5. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Darrin Dexheimer supported this idea  · 
  6. 5,631 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    221 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.

    We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Darrin Dexheimer supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darrin Dexheimer commented  · 

    Bump! - we have 700+ clients sending us files via SFTP today. I fully expected a Managed SFTP Service in Azure. Specifically an Azure native solution, direct to blob/file storage (not a third party solution)

Feedback and Knowledge Base