Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL)

My feedback

  1. 46 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) commented  · 

    Yes, it would be really great if I could apply several conditions/validities to pages that could be controlled with defined rules and that would become active after publication.

    For example:
    - Some pages should be visible to everyone without signed-in.
    - Some pages should be visible to all user that are signed-in.
    - Some pages should be only visible to the user if a related API product or API is visible for the user that has signed in to the portal.*
    - Some pages that are still in status "in work" should be hindered from publishing until the page status changed to release. Would be great if a status and condition could be applied to each page.

    *)It would be very important for us to let the content be more dynamic depending on the APIs that are currently exposed and available in the portal. If a page is related to a dedicated API and the API is not visible to the user than the page should also not be visible to the user. Same mechanism would be also good on a widget or block level.

    Not sure if it needs a separate feature request for the additional requirement to display dedicated pages only if the related API is visible to the currently signed-in user. Or if this requirement should be extended to a more sustainable and comfortable solution to allow a set of dedicated conditions.

    By the way, if pages are not displayed to dedicated user, the navigation items that reference to such pages should be removed as well.

    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    triaged  ·  0 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  4. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) commented  · 
  5. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) commented  · 

    We would appreciate a special role not only for content writers, but also for reviewer and approver of the contents in draft status. Reviewers/approver could be any person in the company that would need temporary access to the portal. A one-time review activity would not justify the effort to apply admin rights to the APIM management of the related resource.

    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  6. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) commented  · 

    Either an additional table/list widget or a new table function within the existing "text block" widget would work for me. Maybe, an advanced text editor function would do.
    Would be also great if there would be different styles and layouts that could I could applied for each tables.

    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  7. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are planning to address this issue as part of our developer portal work.


    Thanks for the feedback. Even though it’s possible to embed API Management developer portal experience into another portal in the true sense, it’s possible to integrate it with another portal for a more seamless experience using delegation – see docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/api-manageme…

    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  8. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  9. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  10. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  11. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  12. 58 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Miao Jiang responded

    Thanks for the feedback. Can you please provide a little more details on how you want this to work? Do you want this feature on developer portal or admin portal or both? Thanks!

    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) supported this idea  · 
  13. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) shared this idea  · 
  14. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  API Management » Developer portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Reichenbacher, Angelika (SHS DI DH TP PL) shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base