Sam Vanhoutte

My feedback

  1. 101 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte shared this idea  · 
  4. 99 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Logic Apps » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
    Sam Vanhoutte shared this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte shared this idea  · 
  6. 993 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    50 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  7. 125 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  8. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  4 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sam Vanhoutte commented  · 

    wouldn't that just totally decrease the perf/throughput of the analytics?

  9. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  10. 69 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  API Management » Pricing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sam Vanhoutte commented  · 

    Every service that costs money because of compute resources should be stoppable / suspendable by default. This should be a minimum release criteria for every Azure service.
    For example: Azure API Management and BizTalk Services instances. While there are relatively cheap dev-instances, they still consume a lot of resource, even when not using them. Allowing them to be stopped and deallocated would save a lot of costs for developers.

    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  11. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte shared this idea  · 
  12. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  API Management » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte shared this idea  · 
  13. 681 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  26 comments  ·  API Management » API management experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  14. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  API Management » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  15. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Biztalk Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  16. 968 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  33 comments  ·  API Management » Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  17. 68 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  API Management » Policies  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  18. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Biztalk Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Anurag Dalmia responded

    We are working on enabling this functionality. Thanks for your feedback.

    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sam Vanhoutte commented  · 

    This is really needed. And it again shows that we need to have extensibility everywhere.
    Now, it's not possible to send to a queue that requires sessions, for example. No way to workaround this (unless if we add another EAI bridge to do this job?)

  19. 240 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sam Vanhoutte commented  · 

    Really, this is my top number 1 feature request! Especially since it's very unpredictable how subscriptions get added to directories... There should be an option indeed to have an "all tenants" selection box (or to use checkboxes for the directories)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sam Vanhoutte commented  · 

    i agree that it becomes very cumbersome to manage multiple subscriptions
    i want to see all my accounts in one view

    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  20. 209 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base