Sam Vanhoutte

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure IoT Edge » Deploying modules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte shared this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Stream Analytics » Inputs and Outputs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte shared this idea  · 
  3. 67 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is something we’re thinking about, but would like to ensure that we’re providing a sufficiently robust set of capabilities within the template language syntax itself.

    What scenarios are “overly complicated and hard to maintain”? This will help us understand where we need to invest.

    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  4. 71 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Enterprise Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  5. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Logic Apps » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  6. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  API Management » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  7. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte shared this idea  · 
  8. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  9. 45 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  9 comments  ·  Azure IoT » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
    Sam Vanhoutte commented  · 

    Elio, I believe the question is to foresee something where we can disable/suspend an IoT hub, so that it does not cost any money. This is typically something we can use during test/acceptance phases, where the IoT hub can be enabled for performance / integration tests, but disabled when no longer used.

  10. 53 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  11. 3,818 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    127 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Reopening this user voice item as our support for Skip/Take (Offset/Limit) was only limited to single partition queries.

    Update.

    The newly released .NET SDK v3 now includes support for x-partition queries using Offset/Limit. You can learn more about v3 SDK and try it and provide feedback on our github repo here.
    github.com/azure/azure-cosmos-dotnet-v3

    We will also be back-porting this functionality to our .NET v2 SDK. This work will begin shortly and we anticipate it to be released in September.

    Once that is released we will mark this feature as complete.

    Thank you for your patience and votes.

    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  12. 3,916 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    81 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  13. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Saveen responded

    Thanks for the feedback Tom.

    If I understand this scenario correctly, you want to be able to use a U-SQL Catalog almost like a NuGet feed? So that for example, someone could pull and register assemblies into their VS Projects from a U-SQL Catalog. Do I have that right?

    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  14. 1,058 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  16 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  15. 413 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  16. 129 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  7 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte commented  · 

    Exactly. It's really important that we can build "losely coupled" solutions on this. Ideally the communication services would just publish events to which actors can register/subscribe.

    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  17. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte shared this idea  · 
  18. 118 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte commented  · 

    Yes, this is something we also need! We have to create hundreds of ASA jobs and a lot of them include PowerBI output (real time dashboarding)
    I believe it's because of the authentication dance, but this really blocks us from automating the provisioning of our solution.
    Is this something that is being planned for ?

    Thanks !

    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  19. 132 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
  20. 78 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sam Vanhoutte supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base