Derek Gabriel

My feedback

  1. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  2. 199 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’ve started deploying the feature to a small set of stamps. We’ll continue to monitor the stamps for performance and validate if the feature is working as expected. Once we are confident there are no issues, we will roll out to all regions.

    Thanks,
    Oded

    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,537 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    43 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  4. 386 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  5. 137 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  6. 515 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  7. 353 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The status of this item has been moved back to Under Review. We initially planned to move to VHDX support as part of our support for HyperV Gen2 VMs, but we ended up using the VHD format for Gen2 VMs as well. Some aspects of the Azure Infrastructure do not cleanly support VHDX OS or data disks. So this feature is dependent on some of these internal services being updated which is an ongoing process.

    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  8. 68 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel shared this idea  · 
  9. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Stack » Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Derek Gabriel commented  · 

    I couldn't agree more with this, I'm out of votes, so consider this my vote... The idea of supporting these services in production right now scares the **** out of me... I have setup an ASDK and have tried to get both SQL and App Service paas functions activated and have been unsuccessful. I've spent 10s of hours trying and I feel like I've just created a mess. To me the paas services are core to what Azure is and what Azure Stack should offer. You flat out tell us we shouldn't be using Azure Stack as a virtualization replacement for Hyper-V, but the only thing we get out of the box is VM support at this point.

  10. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Stack » Compute  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 112 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Azure Stack » Compute  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Derek Gabriel commented  · 

    Is both too much of a stretch? If I was forced to choose, we would have more use for NV.

  12. 69 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Stack » Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Derek Gabriel commented  · 

    We just ordered a machine for ASDK from Lenovo. This is a POC setup, and we really intend to drop it into the same rack in the DC that the full stack will end up in. It's important to test the networking environment as well if we're going to be spending $300k eventually...

  13. 110 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Stack » Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  14. 160 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  Azure AD Team responded

    Azure MFA is currently designing the experience for FIDO 2.0. This is the next iteration of the FIDO U2F standard that the link references.

    Richard

    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  15. 1,334 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    38 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of blob storage lifecycle management. The feature set offers a rich, rule-based policy engine which you can use to transition your data to the best access tier and to expire data at the end of its lifecycle. See our post on the Azure Blog to get started: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-blob-storage-lifecycle-management-public-preview/preview/.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at DLMFeedback@microsoft.com.

  16. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  17. 716 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  115 comments  ·  Azure portal » Search + navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  18. 128 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  19. 177 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of blob storage lifecycle management. The feature set offers a rich, rule-based policy engine which you can use to transition your data to the best access tier and to expire data at the end of its lifecycle. This framework can be used to match and tier blobs based on prefix to enable batch archiving of an account, containers, or even virtual directories. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for account and container level archiving exists. See our post on the Azure Blog to get started: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-blob-storage-lifecycle-management-public-preview/preview/.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at DLMFeedback@microsoft.com.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Derek Gabriel commented  · 

    This missing seems foolish. How hard could it be to cycle through the blobs when I enable this on the container? I assume I can do it through the API, so just add a check box that saves me the time....

    Derek Gabriel supported this idea  · 
  20. 4,908 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    162 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

    Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

Feedback and Knowledge Base