Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Bevan, John

My feedback

  1. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bevan, John supported this idea  · 
  2. 83 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bevan, John supported this idea  · 
  3. 179 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  27 comments  ·  Azure Portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bevan, John supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bevan, John commented  · 

    FYI: I've just submitted a similar suggestion: default the region of a resource based on the parent resource group; default the resource group based on the subscription. https://feedback.azure.com/forums/223579-azure-portal/suggestions/43025910-inherit-region-from-parent.

  4. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Portal » Create + deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bevan, John shared this idea  · 
  5. 6,388 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    252 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bevan, John supported this idea  · 
  6. 568 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    96 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bevan, John commented  · 

    Great suggestion.
    I know that the .Net community (which has a lot of overlap with the MS SQL community given all those working on the MS stack) are also keen to see progress in this area.
    I'm not sure how SQL is architected, but perhaps there's sufficient overlap in the code base for the teams to join efforts / get more value back from this investment?

    A call was taking to not implement XPath 2.0 in .Net back in 2004: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dareobasanjo/2004/05/13/why-you-wont-see-xslt-2-0-or-xpath-2-0-in-the-next-version-of-the-net-framework/
    Since then support for XPath 2 and 3 (and related functionality under the XML namespace) has become one of the most requested features, e.g. on the .Net Core GitHub Issues page, first raised in 2015: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/2295

    Bevan, John supported this idea  · 
  7. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 2

    <=-=Mar 13 2017 6:35AM=-=>

    Hi,
    Thanks for the suggestion. We’ll be tracking to see how much interest this generates. We could consider the idea of auditing this information if it can easily be ascertained and there is high demand for this requirement.

    Thanks
    —Ronit.

    Bevan, John supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base