Chris Pietschmann

My feedback

  1. 46 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Magnus. This is currently unplanned by us for our road map. Some context and feedback for you on this.

    First, to do the replication itself to the secondary region you need RU/s sufficient to support the request rates for the primary region itself. Replication and writing to the secondary region itself is not free so there needs to be sufficient throughput provisioned to do that.

    Second, for the secondary region to be able to function as the primary should a fail over occur, the replica region itself needs sufficient throughput to function as the primary.

    Thanks again for your suggestion. Will mark as unplanned for now in case circumstances ever do change.

    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  2. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,556 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    58 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  4. 106 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » MongoDB API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Azure Cosmos DB is a multi-model database service, and therefore supports accessing the same underlying data using any/all APIs. We are however implementing some platform-level changes to make data access from different APIs seamless like supporting conversions between disparate type systems, and capabilities.

    Chris Pietschmann commented  · 

    Is there any update that can be made on the status of this? Or at least a description of what is currently supported and what's not?

    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  5. 126 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  10 comments  ·  Azure portal » Search + navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann commented  · 

    So often you are required to open multiple browser tabs to various different services and blades within the Azure Portal at the same time. it would be nice if the Azure Portal supported tabs more natively.

    Here's 2 suggestions on how tab support could work:
    - Add ability to open links within the Azure Portal in a new browser tab when desired.
    - Add mutli-tab support to the Azure Portal UI / UX itself so you can have multiple blade views open simultaniously.

    The reason for this request:
    When managing production workloads it's often the case where you need to monitor multiple services, and/or make configuration changes in multiple places. It's extremely cumbersome to keep navigating around the Portal between resources, especially when you need to go back and forth between multiple resources.

    There are many times when you need to keep, for instance, an App Insights Live View open, while making database queries to an Azure SQL Database, and checking the trigger status of Azure Functions when monitoring and troubleshooting.

    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  6. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Blockchain  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann commented  · 

    This would be more a limitation of the Solidity language, and not Azure Blockchain Workbench itself. And Solidity does support enums and structs.

  7. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Blockchain  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Blockchain  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann shared this idea  · 
  9. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Blockchain  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  10. 81 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  Azure portal » Getting started  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
    Chris Pietschmann commented  · 

    A personal assistance would be great within the Azure Portal. Perhaps, clippy should be brought back and added to the Azure Portal to help us manage our cloud resources even easier. Maybe you could also rename Cortana to Clippy and give it a happier more helpful voice and personality as well.

  11. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann commented  · 

    Isn't this one already completed?

  12. 90 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This request is for custom domain and custom SSL certificate support for the IoT Hub endpoint. This work is currently unplanned for IoT Hub but we’re listing to customer requests and may chose to support this in the future.

    If you have interest in have a deterministic way of understanding your IoT Hub IP address (and corresponding geo-pair IP address) in order to keep firewall rules up-to-date, see and vote on this request: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/321918-azure-iot/suggestions/15714243-iot-hub-network-address instead.

    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  13. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  14. 105 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    46 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  15. 133 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Azure Migrate  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  16. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann commented  · 
  17. 619 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    23 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    SSL only requires multiple IPs when the client is on Windows XP, using an older version of Internet Explorer. Most modern browsers support SNI (Server Name Indication) and thus don’t require multiple IPs.

    Support for multiple IPs is under review in the team.

    Chris Pietschmann supported this idea  · 
  18. 165 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann commented  · 

    I completely agree with Carl. While this idea sounds good on the surface, it would really end up increasing Microsoft costs of running the service resulting in higher prices. People are already complaining about Azure prices being too high. If you want to donate "unused CPU cycles", then install that stuff on your own computers and leave them running 24 hours a day.

  19. 277 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Pietschmann commented  · 

    This would provide for a security hole in the system. You can't trust any other subdomain at cloudapp.net any more than you trust any other random website. It's most secure for you to map your own custom domain or subdomain to your *.cloudapp.net url and then install your own SSL certificate for your site to use.

Feedback and Knowledge Base