Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Kai Walter

My feedback

  1. 1,754 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    100 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  2. 584 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  3. 404 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  4. 312 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » MongoDB API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kai Walter commented  · 

    I'm for automatic deletion from "Risky users" report some days after deletion of a user account. Or bring it up as a confirmation screen when entering this report to ask for removal of deleted accounts.

    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  6. 486 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  API Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  7. 28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure App Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  8. 152 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  6 comments  ·  API Management » Policies  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  9. 584 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  13 comments  ·  API Management » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  10. 678 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  API Management » Defining APIs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi all – we could really use more information on the use cases you would like us to deliver with this feature. To quote Darrel’s post below:

    Are you looking for some kind of UI in the portal to enable developers to subscribe to webhooks exposed by APIs?
    Or are you looking for the additional security provided API Management to limit what events a user can subscribe to?
    Do you want to correlate the API Management subscription ID with registered webhooks?
    Any information you can give about the scenarios you would like help with would be great.

    Many thanks

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kai Walter commented  · 

    With our integration platform we use API Management and Azure PaaS in 2 directions.

    Inbound into our core systems: this is easy - API Management - Queue - Azure Functions - back-end

    Outbound from our core system: back-end - APIM - Queue - Azure Functions with configured target - consumer

    It would help us that our consumers could register WebHooks on API operations (e.g. PUT customer, PUT sales-order) marked as "outbound". So in our flow we would just call the API operations and APIM would spawn / forward to the WebHooks.
    Meet me on Ignite BRK2200 to see what I mean.

    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  11. 797 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    70 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  12. 991 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    146 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 
  13. 462 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kai Walter supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base