Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Chris Butler

My feedback

  1. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chris Butler commented  · 

    This has nothing to do with any TLS protocol and cipher suite changes. It is directly affected by the SSL Certificate loaded against the HTTPS listener. I'd suggest that you made changes tot he SSL certificate used at the same time as changes to TLS/ciphers and are incorrectly blaming the issue on the latter.

    When using SSL Certificates for Azure Application Gateway, you should have the primary and intermediary cert, but NOT the Root cert included in the PFX file.

    You can view/edit the certificate chain using a tool like KeyStore Explorer.

  2. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chris Butler commented  · 

    How has this been here nearly a year, but hasn't even been looked at. This is clearly a bug in the interface. Not like we are asking for something new, we're asking for the stuff that's already there to work properly!

    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  3. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler shared this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler shared this idea  · 
  5. 580 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    35 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is not currently planned for the normal SQL DB since the databases within a logical server are not hosted within a single server like in SQL Server – they have multiple replicas that are independently placed on different servers due to the high availability architecture in SQL Azure. However, SQL Azure Managed Instance supports use database as a command because all of the databases in that model are on the same SQL instance – just like SQL Server. It is therefore recommended that you consider Managed Instance for migrations from on-premises SQL Server where you can not/do not wish to modify behavior to fit within a single SQL Azure DB.

    Topic left open for comments and voting, but please note that some of the comments left do not seem to recognize that SQL Managed Instance is available and recommended by Microsoft for many of the use cases listed. We…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chris Butler commented  · 

    I really want to swear, but I wont.......... far out........

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chris Butler commented  · 

    "Topic left open for comments and voting, but please note that some of the comments left do not seem to recognize that SQL Managed Instance is available and recommended by Microsoft for many of the use cases listed."

    You must be joking right? Have a fallen asleep and woken up on April 1st 2021? This is possibly one of the most ignorant, short sighted and narrow responses I've ever seen from Microsoft, and trust me I've seen a few!

    To take away a widely used, useful feature, and in the process rendering tools and scripts that DBAs have been using for decades totally useless ALL BECAUSE OF POOR DESIGN AND LACK OF FORETHOUGHT, then suggesting we move away from using the service that you're trying to get us all migrated to, to another solution that isn't fit for purpose and costs THOUSANDS of dollars a month more....... Man, I don't know if I can even come up with the words to describe how idiotic that is.

    But then........... what else do we expect from Microsoft.....

    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  6. 135 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  12 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,407 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    68 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,639 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    53 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  9. 397 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  10. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote & comment on. This allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  11. 47 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Update Management » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chris Butler commented  · 

    Using Alerts from an Automation account is an unnecessarily complicated and round-about way of solving a simple problem, and the emails you get out do not contain ONE SINGLE USEFUL PIECE OF INFORMATION. Just put the space for an email address / AD Group in the Update Deployment Schedule settings and send a simple email with the VMs that were updated and the status of each update.

    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  12. 34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  13. 98 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  14. 68 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  15. 43 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chris Butler commented  · 

    We came across the same issue when using the users IP address to check login token validity for API access to our application.

    If you're coding in .NET there are other methods you can user to get the users IP that will ensure you get the actual IP, rather than the LAN side IP of the Application Gateway which will change as it scales instances up and down.

    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  16. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chris Butler commented  · 

    This also applies to WAF Policies used for Application Gateway as well, and is extremely poor, insecure and violates the fundamental Information Security Principal of Least Privilege (whoever did the technical design on this obviously never sat a CompSci or InfoSec paper in their life).

    HOWEVER I have reliable (as it gets from MS) information that we should expect to see some improvements in this area come to preview within H1 2020.

    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  17. 6,131 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    273 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,850 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    186 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,348 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Folks,

    Thanks for the questions and suggestions. And apologies for not sharing any update on this thread for so long. We’ve been working on this problem and have announced changes on our official team blog (see here: https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2016/09/15/cleaning-up-the-azure-ad-and-microsoft-account-overlap/).

    First, we are acutely aware of the UX pain this is causing and we are sorry for this. We are trying to undo a decade and a half of systems divergence. There are literally hundreds of different engineering teams across Microsoft involved in this effort. So this is taking time.

    Second, we can’t easily “merge” two accounts, or allow IT to “take over” personal Microsoft accounts. There are two main hurdles: (1) The terms of service are fundamentally different for the two account types and (2) they are based on different technologies with different stacks (different identifiers, SDKs, token formats, etc.). We’re working to converge the two stacks but again this…

    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
  20. 159 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) » Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Chris Butler supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base