Vossekop

My feedback

  1. 97 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    triaged  ·  9 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vossekop supported this idea  · 
  2. 102 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  7 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vossekop commented  · 

    I have deleted my previous comment and removed my 3 votes because, as it turns out, there is a perfectly acceptable way of dealing with this issue. For people having the same problems here are the basics:

    Application Insights allows you to mark requests from certain user agents as synthetic. In the full framework version of the SDK this is done in the ApplicationInsights.config file (look for SyntheticUserAgentTelemetryInitializer, or for more information about this file: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/app/configuration-with-applicationinsights-config). In the .NET Core version of the framework you might need to write a simple custom TelemetryInitializer yourself that inspects the request's user agent and marks the telemetry accordingly.

    When everything that is synthetic is marked as such, you can add a simple custom ITelemetryProcessor implementation to filter out all synthetic requests. For an example, see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/app/api-filtering-sampling

  3. 69 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vossekop commented  · 

    Any news on this? Those 6 months are over by now, and I am getting customer questions regarding this feature.

  4. 212 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are looking to add additional MFA options for Azure AD B2C in the next few months. As part of the investigation, we want to learn more about your requirements. Email your feedback to aadb2cpreview@microsoft.com.

    When you say “support for Microsoft Authenticator”, which feature are you referring to?
    1. The ability to see the codes in the authenticator app
    2. The ability to receive push notifications for MFA

    If both, which do you prefer more?

    Again, please email your feedback to aadb2cpreview@microsoft.com. Feel free to include more details about your scenarios/requirements!

    Vossekop supported this idea  · 
  5. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vossekop supported this idea  · 
  6. 101 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vossekop supported this idea  · 
    Vossekop commented  · 

    At least allow us to be able to conform to most NIST standards as described in the following articles (and ofcourse the NIST website):
    https://www.troyhunt.com/passwords-evolved-authentication-guidance-for-the-modern-era/
    https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2016/08/18/nists-new-password-rules-what-you-need-to-know/

  7. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vossekop supported this idea  · 
  8. 711 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vossekop supported this idea  · 
    Vossekop commented  · 

    This would work even better if we could easily query for a list of partitions in the table.

  9. 41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Vossekop commented  · 

    The most simple solution I would see that would work for us, is where we could specify the table name for the output from a column in the input event, or for instance as a constructed string. So for instance this kind of syntax:

    CREATE TABLE input_source (
    OrganizationId NVARCHAR(MAX),
    DeviceId BIGINT,
    Moment DATETIME,
    Value FLOAT,
    )

    SELECT DeviceId as PartitionKey, Moment as RowKey, Value
    FROM input_source
    INTO 'Organization' + OrganizationId

    Vossekop shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base