362 votesplanned · 18 comments · Azure Backup » Retention and Storage · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the commentStuart Cuthbertson commented
As of Sept 2019, I'm upvoting this specifically with regards to the "Backup for SQL Server on Azure VMs" service.
This backup service is very neat and a huge step forward in terms of ease of use.
BUT, it's a little hard to stomach having to pay $0.0224/GB/month to store large monthly backups we legally have to retain for 7 years (but have never yet needed to access) - when we know it's possible to pay just $0.00099/GB/month, less than one twentieth of the cost, to store data in regular Archive-tier block blobs.
Since the SQL Server VM backups are explicitly using block blob storage under the hood, it feels like this should be an option.Stuart Cuthbertson supported this idea ·