Justen Hansen

My feedback

  1. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Justen Hansen commented  · 

    Basically compliance reporting isnt accurate. What is compliant to me is different from MS or another org. What is compliant to me should be defined by whatever updates I "Approved" and are set to "Required" from SCCM. I see this information is already in Update Management, so it should be difficult to measure compliance based on that, rather than just critical and security updates.

    At the moment, the compliance dashboard is not accurate nor useful for our org. Out compliance for example is based on security, critical, update rollups, and updates classifications.

  2. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Update Management » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote & comment on. This allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    Justen Hansen shared this idea  · 
  3. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  4. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Update Management » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  5. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  6. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Justen Hansen commented  · 

    This would be useful for web farms, tiered applications, or even apps that arent clusters but require HA or a particular server maintenance order (WEB01 after DB01).

    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  7. 39 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Update Management » Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  8. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  9. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Update Management » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  10. 84 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  11. 117 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  Update Management » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Justen Hansen commented  · 

    I support this request as well as having an offset so that I can patch 4 days after Patch Tuesday; effective the Saturday after Patch Tuesday.

    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  12. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote & comment on. This allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Justen Hansen commented  · 

    I second this - without this functionality, our customers have no choice but to patch manually, and not use Update Management.

    I've worked on similar functionality with another solutions, and am happy to discuss this at length. Would be great to have this baked right into Azure as native-functionality.

    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 
  13. 105 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Update Management » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Justen Hansen supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base