Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 38 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    This is planned for single URL tests (not multi-step tests), for early 2020. We are planning to have two modes:
    a. fail test if SSL negotiation fails
    b. fail test if SSL cert is about to expire

    For (b), what config options would be you be interested in? Fail if cert will expire in 7 days, 30 days, 90 days?

    -Morgan

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Event Hubs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 136 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Event Hubs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 77 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Event Hubs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 37 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 142 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Diagnostics and Monitoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,077 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  Web Apps » App Service Environment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 85 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 184 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 155 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,718 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    97 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.

    That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.

    Apologies for the delay.

    /Parakh


    Old message:
    We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
    Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 222 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 150 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Any updates on it?

    After a big time investment in moving 20+ functions from Consumption to Premium Plan just to be able to set Vnet Integration now I am hitting this issue :(((

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 117 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 218 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 972 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    45 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. 196 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 656 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  API Management » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 584 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  13 comments  ·  API Management » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base