BenTheBuilder

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  4. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Web Apps » Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  5. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  6. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Web Apps » App Service Environment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    I second this! Currently, we are using ILB Azure Application Service Environment (ASEv2) behind an Application Gateway (WAFv2) and wanted to configure ASMC for our WebApps, but because they have a custom DNS vs azurewebsites.net, we are unable to validate DNS using the CNAME method. If you could allow us to alternatively validate with a TXT record we could then switch those App Services to using ASMC vs User provided.

  7. 250 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  8. 634 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,609 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    27 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    Application Gateway should be used when you are crossing that Public to Private boundary or working within a Private VNET. Azure FrontDoor must point to a Public Endpoint for its backends. So if your solution is public-facing, you should probably use Azure FrontDoor. If the solution is sitting on a VNET on servers/services with no public endpoint, you need to use the Application Gateway. **Posting this for future visitors**

  11. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  12. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  13. 92 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    Why is Page vs Block even an issue to lifecycle management !?!

    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  14. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  15. 92 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    Would love to see an update on this also!! Application Security Groups are way too limited!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    @MSFT - any progress on this?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    This is a GREAT idea!

    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  16. 86 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  14 comments  ·  Azure Cloud Shell » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    Any progress on this?

    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
  17. 5,668 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    223 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.

    We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    When will MSFT figure out how important it is to support this?!

    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    Here we are years later and nothing..

  18. 314 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    Confirmed this now is a thing :)

  19. 351 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    BenTheBuilder commented  · 

    What I've been doing to collect ClientIP is using ApplicationHost.xdt transform on my WebApps to collect the first IP of the XFF until we can fix the ClientIp collection behind AppGW/AFD - this is a bandaide at best. But it does work in that you are able to get ClientIP in your WebApp IIS Logs from both StorageAccount and OMS logging.
    https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/benjaminperkins/2015/03/03/making-changes-to-the-applicationhost-config-on-azure-websites/

    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
    <system.webServer>
    <arrHelper>
    <trustedProxies xdt:Transform="SetAttributes(trustUnlisted)" trustUnlisted="true" />
    </arrHelper>
    </system.webServer>
    </configuration>

  20. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Cloud Shell » PowerShell  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BenTheBuilder supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base