Andriy Svyryd

My feedback

  1. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure portal » Dashboards + tiles  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd shared this idea  · 
  3. 81 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Application Insights » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  4. 48 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thanks for your valuable feedback. Could you please share about your scenario which would help us to better understand the scope. We do have other feedback request from customers to ignore few parts with in SignalTraffic . https://feedback.azure.com/forums/357324-application-insights/suggestions/8395065-server-response-time-needs-to-ignore-signalr#{toggle_previous_statuses}.

    So want to better understand the two requirements and prioritize it accordingly with our existing feature backlog. Please share additional details on your scenario. Thank you

    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Monitor » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote & comment on. This allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  6. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    Andriy Svyryd shared this idea  · 
  7. 163 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    triaged  ·  4 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  8. 221 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  9. 334 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Support for both public and private IP at the same time is available on both V1 and V2 SKU. Customers can host multiple sites behind the same IP and port using multi-site listener today.

    Support for allowing same port on both public and private IP is in the roadmap.

    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  10. 582 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,122 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    53 comments  ·  Networking » Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  12. 944 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    39 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  13. 1,218 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    49 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  14. 1,610 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    70 comments  ·  Networking » IPv6  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    IPv6 in Azure VNET is currently previewing globally- in ALL Azure Public cloud regions.

    Announcement (Service Update): https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/updates/public-preview-microsoft-adds-full-ipv6-support-for-azure-vnets/

    Links to Documentation & Samples
    Full documentation including sample scripts is available here: https://aka.ms/IPv6ForAzureVNETdoc

    A sample JSON template is posted in the quickstart repository: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/resources/templates/ipv6-in-vnet/

    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  15. 182 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  3 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  16. 103 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    triaged  ·  9 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,159 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    39 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  18. 881 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 
  19. 206 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  API Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andriy Svyryd supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base