Wagner Silveira

My feedback

  1. 83 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  API Management » Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wagner Silveira supported this idea  · 
  2. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Logic Apps » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wagner Silveira shared this idea  · 
  3. 181 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wagner Silveira supported this idea  · 
  4. 384 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  17 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wagner Silveira commented  · 

    Is this supposed to be marked as planned now, after the announcements on Integrate 2018?

  5. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Proxies  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wagner Silveira commented  · 

    We should have access to request.body and request.body.<properties> if the content-Type is JSON. This would allow for more advanced mocking capabilities, with semi-dynamic responses based on the request. Right now the functionality is way too limited, but the foundation is already there, as we have access to request.method, request.headers.<headername>, so feels like a natural extension.

    It would still not conflict with APIM, as we are not allowing request transformation, just a more comprehensive mock service, which is one of the advantages of Function Proxies.

    Wagner Silveira supported this idea  · 
  6. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Workflow runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wagner Silveira shared this idea  · 
  7. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Logic Apps » Workflow runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Enterprise Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Josh Twist responded

    Thanks for the feedback – we realize these are important capabilities.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wagner Silveira commented  · 

    As a workaround, now that we have better XML support and the Enterprise Integration Pack, you could add the current BizTalk accelerators to the pack. This would allow us to use those schemas under within Logic Apps..

  9. 1,139 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Wagner Silveira supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base