Haws, Christopher, Arvato SCS

My feedback

  1. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 17

    <=-=Apr 17 2017 7:36AM=-=>

    We need a native JSON data type, like Postgres has. The JSON functions are nice, but it feels very 1.0 and you won’t see widespread adoption of this until we get a native data type. This is especially important in a world where NoSQL and JSON have so much traction.

    <=-=Jun 9 2017 4:19AM=-=>

    Thanks for your suggestions. We understand importance of this requirement, and it is in our backlog. Currently we cannot confirm when we will start working on these improvements.

    Haws, Christopher, Arvato SCS supported this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure SignalR Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Haws, Christopher, Arvato SCS supported this idea  · 
  3. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure SignalR Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Haws, Christopher, Arvato SCS supported this idea  · 
  4. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure SignalR Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Haws, Christopher, Arvato SCS supported this idea  · 
  5. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure SignalR Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Haws, Christopher, Arvato SCS supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Haws, Christopher, Arvato SCS commented  · 

    I would be happy with a cheaper tier, (i.e. a tier that allows 100 concurrent connections that cost between $0.20 and $0.30 per day which would come out between $6 and $10 per month). I cant justify using this service when the cheapest version cost more than the rest of the application combined...

  6. 74 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  18 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Domain Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Haws, Christopher, Arvato SCS supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base