NYC-IT

My feedback

  1. 1,084 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We view this ask as a set of related features.

    Soft delete for blobs enables you to save and recover your data where blobs or blob snapshots are deleted. It does not protect against container or account deletion. This feature is currently generally available. You can see the announcement here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/soft-delete-for-azure-storage-blobs-ga/ and the full documentation here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/blobs/storage-blob-soft-delete

    Object versioning will also offer object-level protection, and will offer a few incremental improvements to soft delete. Specifically, it will make recovery of deleted data easier. This feature is planned for the coming year.

    Container soft delete will protect against container-level deletion and modification. This feature is planned for the coming year as well.

    Native support for blob backup will protect against account-level deletion and modification, and is currently on our backlog.

    We will provide updates when they become available. For any further questions, or to discuss your…

    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,334 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    38 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of blob storage lifecycle management. The feature set offers a rich, rule-based policy engine which you can use to transition your data to the best access tier and to expire data at the end of its lifecycle. See our post on the Azure Blog to get started: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-blob-storage-lifecycle-management-public-preview/preview/.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at DLMFeedback@microsoft.com.

    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,900 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    96 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    As you mentioned, we initiate a change detection job once every 24 hours to enumerate the Azure file share and scan for changes. This is required for the Azure file share because Azure Files currently lacks a change notification mechanism like Windows Server has. Long term we will add this capability and have automatic immediate sync.

    There is now a way to trigger sync to happen on files that are placed directly in the Azure File share. With this new cmdlet you can point sync to particular files or directories and have it look for changes right then. This is intended for scenarios where some type of automated process in Azure is doing the file edits or migrations are done by an admin (like moving a new directory of files into the share). For end-user changes, the best thing to do is install Azure File Sync in an IaaS VM…

    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  4. 493 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    31 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,230 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    42 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  6. 150 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » Bastion  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  7. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  8. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  9. 348 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    NYC-IT commented  · 

    I was able to report on x-forwarded-for via Custom Logs, following an MS article. It is rudimentary but it is something. Microsoft, you can do so much better!!! I wish I had 100 votes!
    IISCustom4_CL
    | extend CSVFields = split(RawData, ' ')
    | extend Date = tostring(CSVFields[0])
    | extend Time = tostring(CSVFields[1])
    | extend WAFIP = tostring(CSVFields[2])
    | extend Method = tostring(CSVFields[3])
    | extend Uristem = tostring(CSVFields[4])
    | extend Uriquery = tostring(CSVFields[5])
    | extend Port = tostring(CSVFields[6])
    | extend UserAgent = tostring(CSVFields[9])
    | extend ClientIP = tostring(CSVFields[16])

    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  10. 314 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  11. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Monitor-Log Analytics » Search UI and Language  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  12. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  13. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Monitor-Application Insights » Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    NYC-IT commented  · 

    My former colleague developed this great tool!
    Application Insights Manager
    https://github.com/Danz-maveRICK/ApplicationInsightsManager
    https://danishnaglekar.wordpress.com/tools-by-me/
    Check it out

    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 
  14. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Monitor-Log Analytics » My Dashboard  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Currently the values of the Computer field are case sensitive and a distinction isn’t made between host names and FQDN. These factors can result in the same computer being reported as different computers.

    Data isn’t being counted multiple times for the servers – typically the difference in name results from how the data was collected (different data sources can report different names).

    NYC-IT supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base