Brian Stewart

My feedback

  1. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our eventual goal is to connect every service in Azure to publish events, however, we haven’t started on Service Bus Standard integration yet.

    We’re passing your feedback along to the Service Bus team, but as always make sure you let them know as well so they hear your voice!

    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
    Brian Stewart commented  · 

    Most use-cases are priced out by Premium, the only other option for using Logic App triggers is polling which causes Logic Apps to be billed for every connector as each poll considers the app as "evaluated" -- so many of my clients are stuck between two bad pricing options with no way out...we could really use this feature.

  2. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  3. 73 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  4. 177 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  23 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  5. 139 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart commented  · 

    Currently, if you use Service Bus triggers for Logic Apps, the trigger uses a time-period polling mechanism to run. Unfortunately, this incurs charges for the entire logic app set of connectors with each poll as it considers this trigger as "evaluated". The only other, newer, option, is to use Event Grid triggers emitted from Service Bus to trigger the Logic App, but this is only available to the Premium SKU of Service Bus. This incurs nearly $10,000 in yearly cost. This presents two different, overly expensive options, for a simple task -- Service Bus triggering a logic app should not require polling and evaluation of all Logic App connectors. If Event Grid is the way forward, it should be available of non-Premium SKUs so it can be utilized by the customers who need it most. Customers who want quality architecture to combine messaging and serverless shouldn't be subjected to such extreme barriers of entry.

    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  7. 450 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    25 comments  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  8. 166 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart commented  · 

    From a consulting and solutioning perspective, the lack of this feature makes Azure a tough sell. Explaining to potential customers that you have to jump through hoops on almost all Azure services to setup SSL, which has become ubiquitous with the modern web, is challenging if not pitiful. Please, please, please, launch some sort of initiative to make SSL available and easily integrated across web-facing services. The "solution" of "oh you can use ssl but you have to upgrade plans / use a cdn / etc" makes everyone in the room cringe.

    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  9. 71 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  10. 4,647 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    144 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

    Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  11. 417 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  API Management » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  12. 7,842 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    201 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 
  13. 1,068 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    67 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.

    That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.

    Apologies for the delay.

    /Parakh


    Old message:
    We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
    Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?

    Brian Stewart supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base