_JJ_

My feedback

  1. 178 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    _JJ_ commented  · 

    The WAF blocks our CDN making it impossible to use services like MaxCDN. Please Microsoft, allow your WAF to allow/disallow certain requests based upon much more flexible rules. Disabling the WAF is our only option. It is useless!!

    _JJ_ supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,908 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    108 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    _JJ_ commented  · 

    Bump bump bump. Come on Azure, you are supposed to be state of the art!

  3. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    _JJ_ commented  · 

    This is an essential feature. Developers need a way to see the definitive client IP address. The X-Forwarded-For Header from the client should be overwritten by Azure with the definitive value. Multiple "hop" values do not help the developer. CloudFlare, for example, has a special header for this purpose. Azure should too.

    _JJ_ supported this idea  · 
  4. 98 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Firewall  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    _JJ_ commented  · 

    It works for us - we see X-Forwarded-For OK, but we use X_FORWARDED_FOR on our platform.

Feedback and Knowledge Base