Troubladore

My feedback

  1. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SQL Server » Setup + Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Troubladore supported this idea  · 
  2. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SQL Server » Setup + Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Troubladore commented  · 

    Agreed with Solomon's comment below. If there is a reason this feature isn't being picked up, it would be nice to know.

    Troubladore supported this idea  · 
  3. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Setup + Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Troubladore commented  · 

    I can think of many times when I needed a more granular event injection handle than is currently provided by SSDT. Expanding the default workflow would allow for advanced build behaviors that would make the product more useful through easier automation. The specific suggestions Solomon made are exactly what I typically need.

    Troubladore supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base