Jeff Miles

My feedback

  1. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  2. 38 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be really advantageous! Along the lines of FQDN resolution within an NSG, additional service tags are always needed.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  3. 62 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  4. 301 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  5. 335 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  6. 792 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    30 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  7. 3,438 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    136 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  8. 78 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Update Management » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    Any update on this feature? It forces our organization to manually update our scheduled deployments every month rather than setting a recurring schedule.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  9. 356 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This is a really crucial feature that's missing right now.

    NIST recommendations are a "Deny by default" posture, even for outbound traffic. We want to adhere to this, and block all outbound, but need to add ability to access Windows Update, and other interfaces like *.argis.com.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  10. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Update Management » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be extremely helpful. We patch Web servers at 8pm on the Wednesday after the 2nd Tuesday of every month, and then DB servers at 130am on the Thursday after the 2nd Tuesday of every month.

    Being able to add an offset of +1 or +2 days would resolve a lot of manual effort.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  11. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Backup » IaaS VM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles shared this idea  · 
  12. 551 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Networking » Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This feature is a must-have. Any update about it's status in the backlog would be appreciated.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  13. 87 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be really excellent. Similar to the "plan" command from Terraform, seeing output of what exactly is changing in production compared to the declared configuration would be extremely valuable, especially if the deployment Mode = "Complete".

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  14. 117 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  StorSimple  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This is a very necessary feature. The StorSimple DR story is very compelling, but if one is using virtual appliances, a Recovery Point Objective of 24 hours from daily snapshots is just not good enough.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base