Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Jeff Miles

My feedback

  1. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Automation » PowerShell cmdlets  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    I second this - for Update Management, we really need the ability to implement things like scheduled deployments with dynamic groups and reboot suppression through PowerShell, and this just doesn't seem possible right now.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cost Management » Cloudyn  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles shared this idea  · 
  3. 49 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » End user experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey folks, thanks for the interest in this, and we have some good news to share. Configurable lockout is in development now (mostly done, actually) and we’re aiming for June or July public preview.

    For configurable password complexity, length, etc, we hear you. Longer passwords are in planning now, and we’re thinking about our approach to how we want to enable the other configurability features. I don’t have any more details to share on this for now, but we do have interest in building features.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  4. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  5. 51 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  6. 38 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be really advantageous! Along the lines of FQDN resolution within an NSG, additional service tags are always needed.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  7. 104 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  8. 578 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    34 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  9. 468 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,132 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    57 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  11. 6,131 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    273 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  12. 173 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Update Management » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    Any update on this feature? It forces our organization to manually update our scheduled deployments every month rather than setting a recurring schedule.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  13. 724 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This is a really crucial feature that's missing right now.

    NIST recommendations are a "Deny by default" posture, even for outbound traffic. We want to adhere to this, and block all outbound, but need to add ability to access Windows Update, and other interfaces like *.argis.com.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  14. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Update Management » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be extremely helpful. We patch Web servers at 8pm on the Wednesday after the 2nd Tuesday of every month, and then DB servers at 130am on the Thursday after the 2nd Tuesday of every month.

    Being able to add an offset of +1 or +2 days would resolve a lot of manual effort.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  15. 148 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  7 comments  ·  Azure Backup » IaaS VM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    The daily limitation of Azure Virtual Machine backups is very restrictive. It makes it difficult to meet any reasonable RPO from a backup strategy.

    Even if our RPO is 24 hours, that means we have to have 100% backup success in order to maintain SLA.

    Being able to back up more frequently would allow better RPO or greater achievement of SLA with managed risk of failed backups.

    I really want to avoid using the in-VM agent to complete this task as it doesn't scale which is the whole point of using Azure Backup!

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  16. 692 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    27 comments  ·  Networking » Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This feature is a must-have. Any update about it's status in the backlog would be appreciated.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  17. 106 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be really excellent. Similar to the "plan" command from Terraform, seeing output of what exactly is changing in production compared to the declared configuration would be extremely valuable, especially if the deployment Mode = "Complete".

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  18. 122 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  StorSimple  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This is a very necessary feature. The StorSimple DR story is very compelling, but if one is using virtual appliances, a Recovery Point Objective of 24 hours from daily snapshots is just not good enough.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base