Jeff Miles

My feedback

  1. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 
  2. 245 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Automation » Integration with other products  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  3. 120 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  4. 65 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be a very good improvement of the ASR service.

    We have IaaS web servers with multiple IIS sites. Each site is bound to a unique static IP. This ensures that we can have dedicated listener ports for 80/443, without adding additional NICs that add multi-homing complexity.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  5. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  6. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  7. 52 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  8. 105 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be a really nice feature. I know the standard answer is "use an internal Load Balancer for your private connection" but that just adds another layer of complexity, not to mention requires consideration for outbound SNAT rules.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  9. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  10. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be a really nice feature. I know the standard answer is "use an internal Load Balancer for your private connection" but that just adds another layer of complexity, not to mention requires consideration for outbound SNAT rules.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  11. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Update Management » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    Any movement on this item? It would decrease our update schedules a significant amount.

    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would really be great, and allow for simplification of the scheduled deployments in a huge way.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  12. 282 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    Prompting again because this is really holding us back from implementing simple IaaS within Azure - so many hurdles to go through to support this!

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  13. 76 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  14. 285 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    53 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Azure AD Connect  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi everyone,
    Thanks for your interest on this feature. This capability is still in the pipeline. The initial estimate was obviously off and we are looking at a new timeline. We are aware of the benefit of having this rollover made automatic and the interest you have on the feature, and that’s how we are looking at it while prioritizing it against other capabilities requests.
    Thanks for your patience!

    Jairo Cadena
    Principal Program Manager
    Microsoft Identity

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  15. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Change Tracking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  16. 50 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    We’re aware of an issue that can cause this error to be logged when the Update Assessment solution is installed.
    You can check if this is what you’re seeing my temporarily removing the Update Assessment solution and confirming the errors stop.

    The Update Assessment solution functionality is not affected and you can safely ignore this error.

    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This is still an issue, and despite the "safely ignore this issue" advice, ignoring errors in the event log is not standard practice.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  17. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Update Management » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    This would be great - ability to store an artifact of a deployment run for compliance reasons.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  18. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Automation » PowerShell cmdlets  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles commented  · 

    I second this - for Update Management, we really need the ability to implement things like scheduled deployments with dynamic groups and reboot suppression through PowerShell, and this just doesn't seem possible right now.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
  19. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cost Management » Cloudyn  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff Miles shared this idea  · 
  20. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » End user experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey folks, thanks for the interest in this, and we have some good news to share. Configurable lockout is in development now (mostly done, actually) and we’re aiming for June or July public preview.

    For configurable password complexity, length, etc, we hear you. Longer passwords are in planning now, and we’re thinking about our approach to how we want to enable the other configurability features. I don’t have any more details to share on this for now, but we do have interest in building features.

    Jeff Miles supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base