We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.
That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.
Apologies for the delay.
We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?
We plan to start work on this in the next 6 months. Please note we don’t have timing on when it would be available for customers.
An error occurred while saving the commentRinaldo commented
Hi Darren, on https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/active-directory-b2c-reference-tenant-type you mention that Australia (region) process of being added to the list. Are there any updates on this?
We do have some capabilities in this space by using either Access Reviews (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/governance/manage-guest-access-with-access-reviews) or the newly-released-to-preview Entitlement Management feature (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/governance/entitlement-management-overview).
If neither of those fulfill your requirements, please add a comment with your scenario for the feature to help us prioritize and design it better.