Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Kohei Ichinohe

My feedback

  1. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » MongoDB API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe shared this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe shared this idea  · 
  3. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe shared this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Databricks » Strong Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe shared this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe shared this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Synapse Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe shared this idea  · 
  8. 192 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Stream Analytics » Advanced Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 273 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kohei Ichinohe commented  · 

    Referring to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/concepts-limits , i understand that 10 RU/GB is needed

    my customer reported that minimum RU cannot lower after data volume increased even at once. This should be improved as it would affect to billing.

    My customer case:
    A container had 2 TB data and throughput increased 20,000 RU. That's okay.
    However, even when the data volume decreased 2 TB to 1.5 TB, minimum RU shows 20,000 and keep the cost charged high.

    If it will take time to improve this request, the behavior should be on public docs below.

    1.Understand your Azure Cosmos DB bill: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/understand-your-bill
    2.Azure Cosmos DB service quotas: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/concepts-limits

  12. 1,982 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    91 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Great news – static IP range for Azure Integration Runtime is now available in all ADF regions! You can whitelist specific IP ranges for ADF as part of firewall rules. The IPs are documented here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/azure-integration-runtime-ip-addresses#azure-integration-runtime-ip-addresses-specific-regions. Static IP ranges for gov cloud and China cloud will be published soon!

    Please refer to this blog post on how you can use various mechanisms including trusted Azure service and static IP to secure data access through ADF:
    https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-data-factory/azure-data-factory-now-supports-static-ip-address-ranges/ba-p/1117508

    Service tag support will be made available in next few weeks. Please stay tuned!

    If your network security requirement calls for ADF support for VNet and cannot be met using Trusted Azure service (released in Oct 2019), static IP range (released in Jan 2020), or service tag (upcoming), please vote for VNet feature here: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/270578-data-factory/suggestions/37105363-data-factory-should-be-able-to-use-vnet-without-re

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kohei Ichinohe commented  · 
  13. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. 50 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe shared this idea  · 
  16. 58 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe supported this idea  · 
  17. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kohei Ichinohe supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base