Ypersiel Jean-pol

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ypersiel Jean-pol supported this idea  · 
  2. 53 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2B  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is in our backlog, but votes and comments about how you would expect this to work are very helpful to our planning/designing the feature so please keep them coming.

    Also, for some scenarios in this space Access Reviews (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/governance/manage-guest-access-with-access-reviews) can be a good way of removing users who no longer need access, including those who don’t have accounts anymore. (Thanks Shawn for pointing that out for everyone!)

    /Elisabeth

    Ypersiel Jean-pol commented  · 

    This is definitely the way that it should be performed (automatically removed) , first it's better to have the guest reference isolated from our main directory, then it should be extremely link to the company user lifecycle if the user change of department we should be warned too .

  3. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2B  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ypersiel Jean-pol commented  · 

    also thing about the licensing model maybe there could be more than 5 times the number of B2B partners

    Ypersiel Jean-pol shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base