Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 299 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,254 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  51 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Been waiting on this for a while now and the workaround is certainly not ideal, especially when dealing with on-premise Windows DNS servers . ETA for adding this most basic DNS server functionality please?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Can we please get an update on this? Using a VM in Azure as a DNS forwarder is clunky, adds complexity and cost, and is holding up larger adoption of Private DNS zones in Azure. This is the most basic DNS functionality. Please get this done!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please strongly consider adding support for this. This has been a frustrating experience. Also, it remains unclear to me whether or not we'll be able to get this to work in under our current architecture which relies on a hub spoke model using global vnet peering with no gateways in the spokes. This will force us to deviate from our standard architecture, adding a lot of complexity for routing, since we will now need to try and route all traffic to the hub with the exception of managed instance traffic which will now need to go spoke-to-spoke rather than through our hub. Giving us the ability to have no public endpoint for a managed instance but then requiring us to have a public IP endpoint for the VPN gateway for database replication is far from ideal.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 689 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  Networking » Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 113 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 1,545 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    76 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 331 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  5 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 429 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 606 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  Automation » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 226 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    47 comments  ·  Azure Management Groups » New Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base