ivan borghetti

My feedback

  1. 134 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    36 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ivan borghetti supported this idea  · 
  2. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Additional Services » Team Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ivan borghetti supported this idea  · 
  3. 432 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    23 comments  ·  Diagnostics and Monitoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ivan borghetti supported this idea  · 
  4. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Monitor » Webhook  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ivan borghetti supported this idea  · 
  5. 207 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    42 comments  ·  Azure Management Groups » New Feature Request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ivan borghetti supported this idea  · 
  6. 72 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Automation » Desired State Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ivan borghetti supported this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ivan borghetti supported this idea  · 
  8. 44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Update Management » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ivan borghetti commented  · 

    the selection of patches that we want to include is a good option however i think the request is different , i will put an example in Linux since i am not very experienced with Windows. Lets say i patch my dev environment today and we have 50 patches in the repo that i apply to my servers. In 2 weeks i will need to patch my prod servers however in the repo there are now 60 patches and in some cases there are also new versions for patches that i applied in dev. A good example would be a kernel versión. In this case it would be really difficult to be able to manage all those variables which today in onprem or with different tolos are managed with local repos (sccm , red hat satellite , tanium ) or with the package reléase dates , for instance , apply the packahes released from x to y only .

    ivan borghetti supported this idea  · 
  9. 76 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    triaged  ·  7 comments  ·  Update Management » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ivan borghetti supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base