Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Kyle

My feedback

  1. 46 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  2. 372 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  53 comments  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Policy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  3. 312 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kyle commented  · 

    Increase in Character Limit for Key Vault names NEEDS to happen. When you have a large instnace where naming conventions matter because of too many people are working in the same space..... Globally unique Key Vault names with only 24 characters limits my naming convention to approximately 10-12 characters that are "user defined"...

  4. 6,437 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    255 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  5. 236 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle shared this idea  · 
  6. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  7. 61 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kyle commented  · 

    Additional functionality to inspect headers to see what kind of request is coming in and based upon that to have exceptions for IP's/ ranges allowed to make those kinds of requests.

    More robust feature set for header inspection and exception management would be greatly appreciated!

    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  8. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  9. 62 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kyle commented  · 

    Allow the ability to inspect specified fields in header and block all and have specified list of exceptions. Ex: range of IPfor for forwarded-client-ip.

    Need more granularity and ability to create advanced rule sets for WAF

  10. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Automation » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle shared this idea  · 
  11. 147 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    37 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  12. 474 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  51 comments  ·  Azure Portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  13. 252 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  9 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  14. 1,841 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    185 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kyle supported this idea  · 
  15. 293 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    32 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The work to start showing creation metadata for new resources and modification metadata for existing resources is currently ongoing, but work is required by each resource provider. As a result, we will be pushing resource types out steadily over the next year or so based on each team’s availability. If you have certain resource types that you wish to be prioritized, please create requests on the feedback pages for those services.

    Kyle supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base