Gary

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
    Gary shared this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Automation » PowerShell cmdlets  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    To be more complete, ideally this will be part of the API so Terraform can add the update extension as part of the VM build and register it with the automation account. Powershell would be a stop gap solution for me.

    Gary shared this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
  4. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary shared this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Security and Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary shared this idea  · 
  7. 422 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    Thank you, thank you, thank you!

    It's good to be able to say that rather that just moaning :D

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    How can this not be "Under Review"?
    The current limitation makes it virtually unusable.

  8. 76 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    I'd say it's the functionality of the extension install that should be changed.
    Installing the extension should set the LCM and assign the node configuration, but not wait for the configuration to complete.
    Splitting infrastructure set up from software set up makes more sense.
    Installing the extension provides the capability, but running the DSC configuration itself should be outside the scope of the install. After all, once the initial install is completed, it's likely that the DSC might change without doing a full redeploy of the environment, the DSC script might have a fault or possibly not even exist at initial deployment.
    Think I'll raise as separate feedback as well.

  9. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
  10. 121 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  12 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    This needs to be per listener, not per App Gateway.

    Gary supported this idea  · 
  11. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Automation » Gallery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary shared this idea  · 
  12. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Gary shared this idea  · 
  13. 654 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  44 comments  ·  API Management » Pricing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    By bundling all the features rather than throughput into the Premium tier you're completely pricing us out of this product.
    You have a whole "how-to" on combining App Gateway with APIM so you get the best of WAF combined with APIM and then discover it'll cost at least £2000 a month just for the APIM.

  14. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary shared this idea  · 
  15. 37 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    This needs to be per listener. If I have a server hosting multiple APIs, I might want to take down a single API for a release rather than the whole server in the backend pool.

    Gary supported this idea  · 
  16. 278 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Networking » Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
  17. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Automation » Desired State Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary shared this idea  · 
  18. 1,239 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    49 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,057 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    46 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
  20. 76 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base