Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Eugen Podaru

My feedback

  1. 621 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    22 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  2. 3,258 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    113 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  3. 33 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Databricks » Strong Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote & comment on. This allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  4. 23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  5. 40 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Databricks » Strong Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  6. 52 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  7. 103 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  8. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru shared this idea  · 
  9. 166 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  10. 304 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Eugen Podaru commented  · 

    While for most of the scenarios running a stored procedure as a subsequent activity is fine, there is one scenario where that is not possible, and this feature becomes mandatory.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/connector-azure-sql-database#best-practice-for-loading-data-into-azure-sql-database

    From the documentation, the best practice for loading data into azure sql in case of an upsert is to use a global temporary table. Unfortunately this does not work as described in the documentation since while it is possible to create the temp table with the preCopy script, then use the copy activity to load data into that table, there is no way to execute a merge script without a postCopy script. Running a separate stored procedure activity is not possible, since by the time it is run, the temporary table is already dropped, since the new activity creates a new session.

  11. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  12. 6,395 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    252 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  13. 41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Eugen Podaru commented  · 

    This is something that would open up a whole range of possibilities. Please make it happen and soon

    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  14. 38 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  15. 112 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  16. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Saveen Reddy responded

    Thanks for the feedback Tom.

    If I understand this scenario correctly, you want to be able to use a U-SQL Catalog almost like a NuGet feed? So that for example, someone could pull and register assemblies into their VS Projects from a U-SQL Catalog. Do I have that right?

    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  17. 65 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  18. 48 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  19. 204 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  13 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
  20. 40 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Eugen Podaru supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base