Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Yohan S.

My feedback

  1. 6,392 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    252 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. 1,113 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    57 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Yohan S. supported this idea  · 
  4. 43 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Yohan S. shared this idea  · 
  5. 60 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Search » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. 565 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Yohan S. supported this idea  · 
  7. 176 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 88 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 1,439 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  41 comments  ·  Azure Search » Client SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Yohan S. supported this idea  · 
  10. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 449 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Yohan S. supported this idea  · 
  12. 939 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  25 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Yohan S. supported this idea  · 
  13. 1,760 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    46 comments  ·  Azure Search » Pricing and Quotas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Yohan S. supported this idea  · 
  14. 274 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search » Multi-tenancy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 64 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Scheduler » API & SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Kevin Lam responded

    It would be helpful to hear which variables would be most useful to everyone by adding them to the comments of this suggestion.

    Thanks,
    Kevin

    Yohan S. supported this idea  · 
  17. 121 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Scheduler » Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Kevin Lam responded

    Mr. Andersson,
    To be clear, do you mean the retry policy for an HTTP request (which includes the timespan between retries and the number of retry attempts to make)?

    Thanks,
    Kevin

    Yohan S. supported this idea  · 
  18. 209 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    32 comments  ·  Global Infrastructure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Guy Burstein responded

    Thanks for the suggestion. We’re reviewing it.

    Yohan S. supported this idea  · 
  19. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Scheduler » Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Kevin Lam responded

    Thank you for submitting this idea! This has been something that we have been considering but were waiting for customer feedback. In regards to your last question about overriding the feature could you provide more clarity as to what you are looking for?

    Thanks,
    Kevin

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Yohan S. commented  · 

    If I have 30 Jobs which will call the same API with the same credential It will be great to manage it from a JobCollection.

    However If I have 5 different Jobs which will call, each ones, different APIs with different credentials, It would be great to have a JobCollection to store all of them and having the possibility to define credentials directly into Jobs instead of creating a JobCollection for each credential.

    If you are going to make this change, It would be great to still keep the possibility to define credentials by Job.

    Thanks

    Yohan S. shared this idea  · 
1 2 3 4 6 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base