Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

John Q. Martin

My feedback

  1. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SQL Server » Setup + Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  2. 49 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  3. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  5. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin shared this idea  · 
  6. 955 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  7. 174 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  16 comments  ·  SQL Managed Instance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  8. 57 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  SQL Managed Instance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  9. 138 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  SQL Managed Instance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for using Azure Feedback and sharing your thoughts and feedback on enabling Polybase functionalities in Azure SQL Managed Instance.

    We started working on it, and happy to announce our first milestone:
    Private preview of querying external data (Parquet files) in Azure Data Lake Service (ADLS) Gen2 from Managed Instance. You can learn more about the currently available functionalities from the onboarding guide:

    https://sqlmipg.blob.core.windows.net/azsqlpolybaseshare/Azure_SQL_Managed_Instance_Polybase_Private_Preview_Onboarding_Guide.pdf

    If you are interested in trying it, or would like to share more detailed feedback on the Polybase support, contact us by following instructions from the onboarding guide.

    Thanks,
    Azure SQL Polybase team

    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  10. 120 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Database » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin shared this idea  · 
  12. 1,502 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    57 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Q. Martin supported this idea  · 
  13. 72 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  8 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Q. Martin commented  · 

    The answer here is not to burden SQL Server with the 'functionality' but rather design applications in the correct way to handle transient connection failures. There is a wealth of material and .NET libraries that will help with this.

Feedback and Knowledge Base