Guillermo L Dufourc

My feedback

  1. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 4

    <=-=Jul 21 2009 7:55AM=-=>

    Hi,

    Thankyou for this suggestion. Makes good sense. (Of course, declaring @coldat to be typeof foo.col1 would still allow us to call get_foo with any argument of that type. That’s to say, it does not tie get_foo to work only with the particular column foo.col1)

    (It’s also worth considering that typeof could apply, not just to a single column, but a set of columns)

    Amazing really that such a simple idea (which is time-saving, and avoids spontaneous breakage down-the-line) was not included into the SQL language from the outset.

    Anyhow, I’ll add it into the TODO list.

    Thanks,

    Jim Hogg

    <=-=Aug 18 2009 11:02AM=-=>

    The was a great feature that Informix had almost 10 years ago. You never had to look up the exact column var type from the table. We get bugs all the time from column sizes being increased, but the sproc…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Guillermo L Dufourc commented  · 

    This simple feature would be great for time saving, and avoid overflow errors

    Guillermo L Dufourc supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Guillermo L Dufourc commented  · 

    I totally agree, When you have more than 100 objects, it is a must to group objects and then schema, and to have another branch grouped by schema and then objects

    Guillermo L Dufourc supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,598 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  656 comments  ·  SQL Server  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Guillermo L Dufourc supported this idea  · 
  4. 499 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    36 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Guillermo L Dufourc supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base