André Melancia [MCT]

My feedback

  1. 3,066 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    André Melancia [MCT] commented  · 

    It's been 2 years since this became "under review". This is not so difficult to implement. Please share development process.
    DNSSEC is now required by the majority of government and academic organisations.

    André Melancia [MCT] commented  · 

    Any news on this? This is a requirement in many companies now.

    André Melancia [MCT] supported this idea  · 
  2. 212 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    André Melancia [MCT] commented  · 

    All you need to do is allow hibernation in the system firmware for the VM, which should never have been disallowed in the first place.

  3. 1,553 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    65 comments  ·  Networking » IPv6  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    IPv6 in Azure VNET is currently previewing globally- in ALL Azure Public cloud regions.

    Announcement (Service Update): https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/updates/public-preview-microsoft-adds-full-ipv6-support-for-azure-vnets/

    Links to Documentation & Samples
    Full documentation including sample scripts is available here: https://aka.ms/IPv6ForAzureVNETdoc

    A sample JSON template is posted in the quickstart repository: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/resources/templates/ipv6-in-vnet/

    André Melancia [MCT] commented  · 

    This ticket is THREE years old, and 2½ years ago there was an official response.
    That FAQ is exactly the same as it was 3 years ago, and no IPv6 connectivity in sight.
    Practically all Microsoft products (Windows included) support IPv6.
    How hard is it to have it in Azure? Half the world has done it!

    André Melancia [MCT] supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    André Melancia [MCT] shared this idea  · 
  5. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  9 comments  ·  Azure portal » Search + navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    André Melancia [MCT] commented  · 

    In the portal, include a "All ACTIVE services" list, so that anyone can see, on the fly, all active/running/deployed services which incur in charges.
    Without this, it's currently impossible to see all services that are running (it was possible in the "All Items" option on the old manage site).

    André Melancia [MCT] supported this idea  · 
  6. 1,138 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    André Melancia [MCT] supported this idea  · 
  7. 58 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    André Melancia [MCT] commented  · 

    On the "new" portal, on a "default" dashboard, my browser rose to 1GB (Edge) and in the same day IE to over 500MB.
    Also, it's impossibly slow. It's not just a memory leak, it's really bad programming as well.

    André Melancia [MCT] supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,954 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    272 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    André Melancia [MCT] supported this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    André Melancia [MCT] shared this idea  · 
  10. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » IPv6  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    André Melancia [MCT] shared this idea  · 
  11. 332 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The status of this item has been moved back to Under Review. We initially planned to move to VHDX support as part of our support for HyperV Gen2 VMs, but we ended up using the VHD format for Gen2 VMs as well. Some aspects of the Azure Infrastructure do not cleanly support VHDX OS or data disks. So this feature is dependent on some of these internal services being updated which is an ongoing process.

    André Melancia [MCT] supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base