Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure)

My feedback

  1. 108 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  2. 64 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  7 comments  ·  Web Apps » Supportability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Thank you for your feedback. We understand the issue of hanging subnets and it is in plan to be addressed.

  3. 55 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Thank you for the feedback, we are reviewing this request.

  4. 215 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Please note that the behavior captured in the post by Arturo was considered unintentional from the SDK team and removed in a later version update. We are working with them to make this formally supported, but right now the instructions in that post may no longer work.

  5. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is great feedback.
    We strive for platform upgrades to happen transparently to you, however, they will restart every worker for your function app while performing a platform upgrade.

    We do not currently have the infrastructure to make this publicly available, but keep the votes coming!

    Thanks!
    Alex
    Azure Functions Team!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) commented  · 

    Hello! This is great feedback. I'm editing the wording of this post to make it a bit more clear to our team. Feel free to comment if we haven't matched your intent.

  6. 159 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    26 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) shared this idea  · 
  7. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Web Apps » Diagnostics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) shared this idea  · 
  8. 88 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Here’s the latest as there seem to be 2 types of ask here and so two seperate updates. Need comments for if this issue should close to be focused on one or other:

    1. I want to control how many calls my function can make to another API (the 3rd party API rate limiting).
    – In all plans we now have a way to specify the max instances. This can limit how far a function app instance can scale: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-scale#limit-scale-out

    2. I want to stop my function from triggering more than x times an hour.
    Nothing planned in this in the short term. Using API Management for HTTP functions with throttles would be our recommendation for HTTP, nothing out of box for non-HTTP triggers yet.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) commented  · 

    Merging this with duplicate request for throttling.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) commented  · 

    Merging this with a duplicate related to global throttling controls. We believe that an actual per-execution throttle will be more effective than a server limit.

  9. 682 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    The support for TLS 1.3 in Web Apps will be implemented once the underlying infrastructure supports it. We still don't have an ETA on that being added.

    Thanks,
    Oded

  10. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Web Apps » Linux  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) commented  · 

    Understood. We still don't have the capability to scale each container separately.

    Currently, scaling happens at the App Service Plan level and all containers in multi-containers are hosted in the same plan, therefore scale together.

    We haven't decided yet if we will pursue this use case, but we will leave the request open here to gather potential customer support.

    Thanks,
    Oded

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) commented  · 

    Thanks again for feedback.

    The specific use case as you stated in the comment is on our roadmap. We will update status once we have a timeline.

    Thanks,
    Yi

  11. 59 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    This item is still on our backlog for review, but did not make it into update 3. We will continue to review this for Azure App Service on Azure Stack.

  12. 687 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  API Management » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) supported this idea  · 
  13. 43 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Web Apps » App Service Environment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Thanks for your feedback. We will take this into consideration for our Python3.6 offering (currently in development).

    Asavari

  14. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Moved feature request to App Insights.

  15. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Moved to management in App Insights.

  16. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Moving item to Azure SQL uservoice

  17. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Proxies  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Merging this with a similar item

  18. 128 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Moved request to the Application Gateway forum.

  19. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Moved to the networking forum for follow up.

  20. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Matt,

    Thanks for the feedback. The status of this ask is a bit complicated – it’s partially working, but partially in progress:

    1. For existing SSTP P2S VPN, there is no solution but to download the VPN client package again.

    2. For IKEv2 P2S VPN, it works by P2S client reconnecting to the Azure VPN gateway. Once they connect again, they will get the new routes. This will apply to changes in VNet address spaces (including VNet peering), newly added S2S/VNet-to-VNet connections, or new routes learned via BGP.

    3. The caveat for (2) is that it currently works on Mac and Linux, but Windows require a KB/Update that will be released shortly.

    We will provide an update to this item once the Windows update is available.

    Thanks,
    Yushun [MSFT]

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminAzure App Service team (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) commented  · 

    moved to the networking forum to solve routing between gateway types.

    Thanks,
    Oded

← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base