AdminAzure App Service team
(Admin, Microsoft Azure)
My feedback
-
1 vote
-
30 votes
Hello,
VNet integration is now in public preview in production.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/appserviceteam/2018/10/17/new-app-service-vnet-integration-feature/
Thank you,
Jason -
17 votes
Thanks for the idea! We are reviewing the information.
Oded
This feature is committed to and currently under development! We are expecting development to finish by the end of December.
Thanks,
Jason -
62 votes
the current plan is to provide throttling controls on a per instance base, which would enable limiting the amount of executions. This can work for scenarios where downstream resources cannot be strained or even DOS attacks.
Thanks!
EduardoMerging this with a duplicate related to global throttling controls. We believe that an actual per-execution throttle will be more effective than a server limit.
-
2 votes
If this was on the ASDK - please post on the Azure Stack forum -https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/azure/en-US/home?forum=AzureStack where members of our team will respond. If it is ASDK do you have enough capacity to deploy all of the resources required, that seems to be the potential root cause in addition to the inability to reach your SQL instance.
If this is for an integrated system and you are still blocked by this issue please open a support ticket.
-
10 votes
This looks like a problem with API Management. Moving this issue over to the APIM UserVoice queue.
Alex
Azure App Service Team -
17 votes
Hi Thomas,
Some feedback from our team:
We do not update the SSL binding on rare cases, and we do have the code working just that it happens on a different task. This is definitely a bug we will be fixing as soon as we can. Most likely will be dealt with in June.
Thanks,
OdedJust to update that we still have this work on our backlog but it has been delayed a bit. Our intention is to improve the UX to do a sync with the certificates after change.
Thanks for the additional details in GH. I'll have the engineers on our team sync with the doc folks that answered here.
Oded
-
145 votes
this is being planned, will send a further update once it has started.
thanks
— Eduardoordering in serviceBus is guaranteed through sessions. Linking this issue to the one tracking sessions
-
101 votes
Thanks for the suggestion, that is definitely a good ask, we will look into it
Ahmed
Azure App Service teamJust to comment here that this is still something we want to pursue, but it has been lower in priority compared with other deliverables we are working on.
Thanks,
Oded -
83 votes
Hi, This scenario is currently unsupported, you can move your app between resource groups but you can’t move it to another app service plan if the destination app service plan is in a different resource group than the source resource group, even if both app service plans are on the same scale unit.
We are currently investigating how we can add the support for such scenario, and we will share any updates.Ahmed (App Service Team)
We still don't have other news here other than cloning is the solution we suggest. We will definitely update if there is future work done on this front to make moving apps between Resource Groups seamless.
Thanks,
Oded -
5 votes
Please check the feature we have to support multi-containers within App Service.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/appserviceteam/2018/05/07/multi-container/
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/appserviceteam/2018/06/27/use-acr-for-multicontainer-web-app/Does this meet the needs?
Thanks,
OdedUnderstood. We still don't have the capability to scale each container separately.
Currently, scaling happens at the App Service Plan level and all containers in multi-containers are hosted in the same plan, therefore scale together.
We haven't decided yet if we will pursue this use case, but we will leave the request open here to gather potential customer support.
Thanks,
OdedThanks again for feedback.
The specific use case as you stated in the comment is on our roadmap. We will update status once we have a timeline.
Thanks,
Yi -
1 vote
This is still on our backlog for review, this did not make it into update 2. We will continue to review this for Azure App Service on Azure Stack.
This item is still on our backlog for review, but did not make it into update 3. We will continue to review this for Azure App Service on Azure Stack.
-
295 votes
Please tell us a bit more about scenarios you are trying to enable and how do you see this feature working.
AdminAzure App Service team
(Admin, Microsoft Azure)
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Python support is now available on App Service Linux. Follow the quickstart tutorial here – https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/containers/quickstart-python to get started.
Thanks for your feedback. We will take this into consideration for our Python3.6 offering (currently in development).
Asavari
-
2 votes1 comment · Application Insights » Service monitoring and diagnostics · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Moved feature request to App Insights.
-
22 votes
No change, but moving this to unplanned to better reflect project status.
—Colby
AdminAzure App Service team
(Admin, Microsoft Azure)
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
It is currently on our backlog, unfortunately I don’t have an ETA for it
Ahmed
Azure App Service TeamMoved to management in App Insights.
-
1 vote
Moving item to Azure SQL uservoice
-
7 votes
This is a great idea!
I’ve linked it up to a github issue for the same feature. https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-host/issues/1968
-Alex
Azure Functions TeamMerging this with a similar item
-
32 votes
Thank you for your feedback. It is the order of rules which determines how request is processed. Adding reordering and priority for rules is planned.
Moved request to the Application Gateway forum.
Could you please provide more details on the scenario? Is your problem with HD Insights or App Service?