AdminAzure App Service team
(Product Owner, Microsoft Azure)
My feedback
-
197 votes
We don’t have an exact timeline for this, but this is something we’re eager to light up and have some preliminary work underway for. This will likely show up for Storage first, but messaging services like Event Hub would be shortly after.
An error occurred while saving the comment -
2 votes
This is great feedback.
We strive for platform upgrades to happen transparently to you, however, they will restart every worker for your function app while performing a platform upgrade.We do not currently have the infrastructure to make this publicly available, but keep the votes coming!
Thanks!
Alex
Azure Functions Team!An error occurred while saving the comment Hello! This is great feedback. I'm editing the wording of this post to make it a bit more clear to our team. Feel free to comment if we haven't matched your intent.
-
154 votes
This is now available for Windows apps. Linux support is coming soon.
AdminAzure App Service team
(Product Owner, Microsoft Azure)
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thanks for your feedback . We are looking into it.
AdminAzure App Service team
(Product Owner, Microsoft Azure)
shared this idea
·
-
88 votes
Here’s the latest as there seem to be 2 types of ask here and so two seperate updates. Need comments for if this issue should close to be focused on one or other:
1. I want to control how many calls my function can make to another API (the 3rd party API rate limiting).
– In all plans we now have a way to specify the max instances. This can limit how far a function app instance can scale: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-scale#limit-scale-out2. I want to stop my function from triggering more than x times an hour.
Nothing planned in this in the short term. Using API Management for HTTP functions with throttles would be our recommendation for HTTP, nothing out of box for non-HTTP triggers yet.An error occurred while saving the comment Merging this with duplicate request for throttling.
An error occurred while saving the comment Merging this with a duplicate related to global throttling controls. We believe that an actual per-execution throttle will be more effective than a server limit.
-
614 votes
Hi there,
Given TLS 1.2 was just enabled on Web Apps, we don’t have a plan for when the work will be done to enable 1.3. We will definitely leave this on the backlog as we will come back to it when relevant
Thanks,
OdedAn error occurred while saving the comment The support for TLS 1.3 in Web Apps will be implemented once the underlying infrastructure supports it. We still don't have an ETA on that being added.
Thanks,
Oded -
6 votes
Please check the feature we have to support multi-containers within App Service.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/appserviceteam/2018/05/07/multi-container/
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/appserviceteam/2018/06/27/use-acr-for-multicontainer-web-app/Does this meet the needs?
Thanks,
OdedAn error occurred while saving the comment Understood. We still don't have the capability to scale each container separately.
Currently, scaling happens at the App Service Plan level and all containers in multi-containers are hosted in the same plan, therefore scale together.
We haven't decided yet if we will pursue this use case, but we will leave the request open here to gather potential customer support.
Thanks,
OdedAn error occurred while saving the comment Thanks again for feedback.
The specific use case as you stated in the comment is on our roadmap. We will update status once we have a timeline.
Thanks,
Yi -
52 votes
This is still on our backlog for review, this did not make it into update 2. We will continue to review this for Azure App Service on Azure Stack.
An error occurred while saving the comment This item is still on our backlog for review, but did not make it into update 3. We will continue to review this for Azure App Service on Azure Stack.
-
663 votes
Please tell us a bit more about scenarios you are trying to enable and how do you see this feature working.
AdminAzure App Service team
(Product Owner, Microsoft Azure)
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
Python support is now available on App Service Linux. Follow the quickstart tutorial here – https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/containers/quickstart-python to get started.
An error occurred while saving the comment Thanks for your feedback. We will take this into consideration for our Python3.6 offering (currently in development).
Asavari
-
3 votes1 comment · Azure Monitor-Application Insights » Service monitoring and diagnostics · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Moved feature request to App Insights.
-
11 votes
It is currently on our backlog, unfortunately I don’t have an ETA for it
Ahmed
Azure App Service TeamAn error occurred while saving the comment Moved to management in App Insights.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Moving item to Azure SQL uservoice
-
20 votes
This is a great idea!
I’ve linked it up to a github issue for the same feature. https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-host/issues/1968
-Alex
Azure Functions TeamAn error occurred while saving the comment Merging this with a similar item
-
125 votes
Thank you for your feedback. It is the order of rules which determines how request is processed. Adding reordering and priority for rules is planned.
An error occurred while saving the comment Moved request to the Application Gateway forum.
-
15 votes
We didn’t see a reply on your specific AD setup. Please feel free to add more detail so we can understand the request more thoroughly.
An error occurred while saving the comment Moved to the networking forum for follow up.
-
24 votes
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the feedback. The status of this ask is a bit complicated – it’s partially working, but partially in progress:
1. For existing SSTP P2S VPN, there is no solution but to download the VPN client package again.
2. For IKEv2 P2S VPN, it works by P2S client reconnecting to the Azure VPN gateway. Once they connect again, they will get the new routes. This will apply to changes in VNet address spaces (including VNet peering), newly added S2S/VNet-to-VNet connections, or new routes learned via BGP.
3. The caveat for (2) is that it currently works on Mac and Linux, but Windows require a KB/Update that will be released shortly.
We will provide an update to this item once the Windows update is available.
Thanks,
Yushun [MSFT]An error occurred while saving the comment moved to the networking forum to solve routing between gateway types.
Thanks,
Oded -
2 votes
Can you elaborate a bit on what you’re looking for? We have site traffic metrics you can view in App Insights, but are you asking about a template for a fully coded site?
Thanks,
OdedAn error occurred while saving the comment Moved to the Azure Portal feature requests. This solution would come in the Portal UI, not specific to Web Apps.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Moved to the Service Fabric forum.
-
4 votes
The Wordpress template has a dependency in Azure database for MySQL and App Service on Linux, neither of which are available in Azure Government yet.
For development and testing purposes, you can use this template which uses MySQL In-App and App Service on Windows:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/tree/master/wordpress-app-service-mysql-inappAlternatively, for production purposes, you can still use App Service on Windows and an IaaS-based MySQL backend instead.
An error occurred while saving the comment Feature request moved over to the Azure Government forum for continued research into support.
An error occurred while saving the comment Azure Gov does not have Wordpress template in its marketplace since Azure database for MySQL is not yet supported here. Also not App Service on Linux/ Web app for containers is not yet supported on Azure Gov.
You can although , manually create a web app , for MySQL use MySQL in-app for small sites or setup MySQL server on Azure virtual machine . Note that the web app are running on Windows .
Please note that the behavior captured in the post by Arturo was considered unintentional from the SDK team and removed in a later version update. We are working with them to make this formally supported, but right now the instructions in that post may no longer work.