Shawn C

My feedback

  1. 156 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  29 comments  ·  SQL Server » Setup + Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shawn C commented  · 

    Under review on "Feb 5, 2018"? Today is Nov 21st 2018.

    What do you expect us to do with SSRS? Stop using it? Use if for free?

    Shawn C commented  · 

    1. This blocks my deployment of SQL Server 2017 database engine. I need SSRS to be the same version for some apps.
    2. I require total isolation of SSRS instances for security

    I assume it's now free to use and I can install anywhere I want with no cost, on all the indivudal app servers instead of a shared BI servers?

    Shawn C supported this idea  · 
  2. 173 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 127

    <=-=Jun 23 2015 8:37AM=-=>

    I’m the first to post a useful comment. This must make me special.

    Seriously though, this would be an excellent solution to having to create a new “scratchdb” to hold my interim ETL data. This would be a major plus in simplifying design of a high performance app.

    <=-=Jul 3 2015 5:04AM=-=>

    In 2014, memory optimized tables, and delayed durability can be used help mitigate these Issues. However neither of this are always completely viable solutions. Brent’s proposed solution is likely the simplest way to achieve this with the least amount of unwanted impact. It is important to note that other platforms implement similar functionality as well. Notably Oracle.

    <=-=Nov 29 2016 3:58PM=-=>

    There are so many good things about this suggestion. I am amazed that SQL does not have the capability to turn off logging for certain tables that you define as no…

    Shawn C supported this idea  · 
  3. 294 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  12 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shawn C supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shawn C supported this idea  · 
  5. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 41

    <=-=Oct 4 2007 10:13AM=-=>

    Thank you for your feature suggestion. We are considering the improvement in our next release.

    <=-=Jan 23 2012 11:23AM=-=>

    It’s been three and a half years, and we’re headed toward our third release since this item was filed, but is this still being considered for “our next release”?

    <=-=Feb 22 2012 7:56AM=-=>

    One simple workaround to allow automation – (A 3 step job):
    1. Create a file _header.txt that has the column headings
    i.e. copy the first row [with header] of a select * from table, paste into excell, keep only headings and save as .txt

    2. bcp out to Data.txt file
    i.e. bcp DB.dbo.table_name out c:\table_name
    Data.txt -Sserver -T -c

    3. Concatenate files with the copy command
    i.e. copy /a /Y C:\tbl_header.txt + C:\tbl_Data.txt C:\tbl.txt

    Also, you can bcp out of a view which offers tremendous additional functionality… :-)

    <=-=May 28 2014 3:54AM=-=>

    Shawn C supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base