Nicols

My feedback

  1. 52 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SQL Managed Instance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is a difficult one to handle technically. However the main theme is cost savings. Are there other cost-saving options (other than pausing) that could address this concern? For example, smaller vCore Managed Instances etc.? On the other hand, implementing pausable Managed Instance can also mean that resuming them will take several hours each time. Is this a concern? Thank you.

    Nicols supported this idea  · 
  2. 69 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  9 comments  ·  SQL Managed Instance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicols commented  · 

    LTR is a top priority for us. once this is in place, we'll migrate our production to MI. in the meantime, we'll have to wait. Turning off TDE, then back up, then turn back on TDE is just not right. it defeats the purpose of TDE.

  3. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Data Sync  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicols commented  · 

    This would be very useful. I am llanning to have a master hub and use data sync to populate databAses for different tenants. The filter would make my life really easy. Right now I have to bcp out and bcp back in or use external tables, very heavy process.

    Nicols supported this idea  · 
  4. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SQL Data Sync  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Shirley Wang responded

    Thanks for the suggestions. We will evaluate its relative priority as we decide how to move the overall Data Sync story forward.

    Nicols supported this idea  · 
  5. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicols supported this idea  · 
  6. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicols supported this idea  · 
  7. 55 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicols commented  · 

    I am considering event hub just because topics dont support this feature. I believe this is very important if we want the functions to be used efficiently with service bus.

    Nicols supported this idea  · 
  8. 4,473 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    178 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.

    We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Nicols supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base