Christopher Brumm

My feedback

  1. 187 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Admin Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  2. 137 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    26 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Conditional Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  3. 2,004 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    416 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » SaaS Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re currently evaluating an option that will provide the functionality offered by nested groups, but removes the complexity nested groups adds. We appreciate your patience on this ask and want to ensure we deliver a solution that benefits all of our customers. Below are use cases that we’d like for you to stack rank, with #1 being priority for you. We thank you for the continued comments and feedback.

    Use case A: nested group in a cloud security group inherits apps assignment
    Use case B: nested group in a cloud security group inherits license assignment
    Use case C: nesting groups under Office 365 groups

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christopher Brumm commented  · 

    1. A
    2. C
    3. B

    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  4. 578 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    84 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Azure AD Connect  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Azure AD Team responded

    Hi everyone,
    Thanks for your interest on this feature. This capability is still in the pipeline. The initial estimate was obviously off and we are looking at a new timeline. We are aware of the benefit of having this rollover made automatic and the interest you have on the feature, and that’s how we are looking at it while prioritizing it against other capabilities requests.
    Thanks for your patience!

    Jairo Cadena
    Principal Program Manager
    Microsoft Identity

    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  5. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christopher Brumm commented  · 
    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  6. 92 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Azure AD Connect  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  7. 78 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Application Proxy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christopher Brumm commented  · 

    Hi,
    today the app proxy works very well for scenarios with trusted devices where no additional protection is needed. But if you want to publish the apps for your partners or public an integration with a WAF can become necessary. We'd really appreciate this feature, because we have a lot of customers who want to publish their (legacy) apps and would like to protect them with a WAF.

    Does anyone know a way to combine both services until there is a buid-in integration?

  8. 69 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Application Proxy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Quick update here that we’re still planning to do this. It will take us some time to complete, but we’ve heard your feedback and know how important it is.
    In the meantime we would love to hear more about the type of data points you would like to see.

    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  9. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Application Proxy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christopher Brumm shared this idea  · 
  10. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,298 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We have released the Authentication administrator and Privileged authentication administrator roles that can manage the authentication methods of the user. If you are using Azure AD Premium, consider enforcing MFA on the user using Conditional Access. We are continuing to work on other roles that will let you manage other MFA settings.

    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  12. 423 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    33 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Conditional Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 
  13. 780 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    52 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Conditional Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christopher Brumm supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base