James Dumont le Douarec

My feedback

  1. 42 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  2. 276 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  10 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  3. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Databricks » Strong Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    Hi,

    the Terraform resource is available here : https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/azurerm/r/databricks_workspace.html
    And since azurerm 1.42.0 VNet injection is supported!

    Regards,
    James

  5. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Databricks » Strong Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cost Management » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Analysis Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  8. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  9. 61 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  10. 46 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  3 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    Great news to see this request « planned » using a (PAT) person access token between Data Factory and Databricks is not really nice for a Infra connection service as it’s associated to an end user.

    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,815 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    398 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » SaaS Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re currently evaluating an option that will provide the functionality offered by nested groups, but removes the complexity nested groups adds. We appreciate your patience on this ask and want to ensure we deliver a solution that benefits all of our customers. Below are use cases that we’d like for you to stack rank, with #1 being priority for you. We thank you for the continued comments and feedback.

    Use case A: nested group in a cloud security group inherits apps assignment
    Use case B: nested group in a cloud security group inherits license assignment
    Use case C: nesting groups under Office 365 groups

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    #1 : A
    #2 : B
    #3 : C

    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  12. 88 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  13. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    Voted!

    Got the confirmation here that it's not supported : https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7d02a624-a909-450b-8bd2-906d0d2103bd/preserve-acl-between-adsl-gen-2-when-using-a-data-factory-copy-data-pipeline?forum=AzureDataLake

    I did the following tests through a Data Factory copy data pipeline and got surprised of the results:

    - ADLS gen 1 to ADLS gen 2 : could preserve ACL (see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/connector-azure-data-lake-store#preserve-acls-to-data-lake-storage-gen2)

    - ADLS gen 2 to ADLS gen 1: couldn't preserve ACL (the option could be set on the json code but it's erased at each run)

    - ADLS gen 2 to ADLS gen 2: couldn't preserve ACL (the error message is : Copy with preserving ACL is not supported from AzureBlobFS to AzureBlobFS)

    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  14. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Databricks » Strong Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  15. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  16. 86 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Data Catalog » Data Sources  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  17. 585 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  13 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  18. 321 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  19. 257 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Diagnostics and Monitoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  20. 275 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Networking » Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    Just for sharing

    [ARM Template] Create a Standard Public Load Balancer with outbound rules : https://jamesdld.github.io/AzureRm-Template/Create-AzureRmLoadBalancerOutboundRules/

Feedback and Knowledge Base