James Dumont le Douarec

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Event Grid » Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Event Grid » Event Sources  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  3. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Network Watcher  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    Hello,

    could you please check that you did enable NSG Flow with Traffic Analytics sent to a Log Analytics Workspace?

    You can check that with the following "Azure Resource Graph Explorer" command, it will output all NSG with Flow Logs & Traffic Analytics -->

    Resources
    | where type =~ 'Microsoft.Network/networkWatchers/flowlogs'
    | extend provisioningState = parse_json(properties).provisioningState
    | extend workspaceResourceId = tostring(parse_json(parse_json(parse_json(properties).flowAnalyticsConfiguration).networkWatcherFlowAnalyticsConfiguration).workspaceResourceId)
    | extend targetResourceId = tostring(parse_json(properties).targetResourceId)
    | where workspaceResourceId != "" and provisioningState == "Succeeded"
    | project ["NSG with Traffic Analytics"]=targetResourceId

  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  5. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Policy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  6. 396 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  14 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Databricks » Strong Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    Hi,

    the Terraform resource is available here : https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/azurerm/r/databricks_workspace.html
    And since azurerm 1.42.0 VNet injection is supported!

    Regards,
    James

  9. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Databricks » Strong Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cost Management » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  11. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Analysis Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  12. 114 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  13. 119 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  6 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    Great news to see this request « planned » using a (PAT) person access token between Data Factory and Databricks is not really nice for a Infra connection service as it’s associated to an end user.

    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  14. 2,411 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    484 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » SaaS Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re currently evaluating an option that will provide the functionality offered by nested groups, but removes the complexity nested groups adds. We appreciate your patience on this ask and want to ensure we deliver a solution that benefits all of our customers. Below are use cases that we’d like for you to stack rank, with #1 being priority for you. We thank you for the continued comments and feedback.

    Use case A: nested group in a cloud security group inherits apps assignment
    Use case B: nested group in a cloud security group inherits license assignment
    Use case C: nesting groups under Office 365 groups

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    #1 : A
    #2 : B
    #3 : C

    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  15. 95 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  16. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Dumont le Douarec commented  · 

    Voted!

    Got the confirmation here that it's not supported : https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7d02a624-a909-450b-8bd2-906d0d2103bd/preserve-acl-between-adsl-gen-2-when-using-a-data-factory-copy-data-pipeline?forum=AzureDataLake

    I did the following tests through a Data Factory copy data pipeline and got surprised of the results:

    - ADLS gen 1 to ADLS gen 2 : could preserve ACL (see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/connector-azure-data-lake-store#preserve-acls-to-data-lake-storage-gen2)

    - ADLS gen 2 to ADLS gen 1: couldn't preserve ACL (the option could be set on the json code but it's erased at each run)

    - ADLS gen 2 to ADLS gen 2: couldn't preserve ACL (the error message is : Copy with preserving ACL is not supported from AzureBlobFS to AzureBlobFS)

    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  17. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Databricks » Strong Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  18. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec shared this idea  · 
  19. 124 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Data Catalog » Data Sources  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
  20. 685 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are very excited to announce the public preview of Azure Data Factory Managed Virtual Network.

    With this new feature, you can provision the Azure Integration Runtime in Managed Virtual Network and leverage Private Endpoints to securely connect to supported data stores. Your data traffic between Azure Data Factory Managed Virtual Network and data stores goes through Azure Private Link which provides secured connectivity and eliminate your data exposure to the public internet. With the Managed Virtual Network along with Private Endpoints, you can also offload the burden of managing virtual network to Azure Data Factory and protect against the data exfiltration.

    To learn more about Azure Data Factory Managed Virtual Network, see https://azure.microsoft.com/blog/azure-data-factory-managed-virtual-network/

    James Dumont le Douarec supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base