Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 160 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 279 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 404 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  Azure AD Team responded

    Our feature team is looking into options for addressing this scenario, but we do not yet have any timelines to share. For now as a workaround, you can manually trigger the reprocessing by updating the membership rule to add a whitespace at the end. We’ve also added the ability to check the membership processing status, to keep track of the status and know if processing is complete.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 701 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,905 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    408 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » SaaS Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re currently evaluating an option that will provide the functionality offered by nested groups, but removes the complexity nested groups adds. We appreciate your patience on this ask and want to ensure we deliver a solution that benefits all of our customers. Below are use cases that we’d like for you to stack rank, with #1 being priority for you. We thank you for the continued comments and feedback.

    Use case A: nested group in a cloud security group inherits apps assignment
    Use case B: nested group in a cloud security group inherits license assignment
    Use case C: nesting groups under Office 365 groups

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 550 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Folks,
    We are working on it. There is an elevation of privilege concern associated with this feature. If a group is assigned a role, any IT admin who can manage group membership can manage that group’s membership and indirectly manage who gets the role. So, we have to ensure that the feature is secure.

    We are taking a staged approach to execute this feature –
    Stage 1: Supporting cloud groups to be assigned to roles
    Stage 2: Supporting on-prem groups to be assigned to roles

    Stay tuned!

    Regards,
    Abhijeet Kumar Sinha
    Azure Active Directory Team

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 321 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hi folks,
    Just a quick update here. We’re still actively working on support for custom roles (RBAC) across Azure AD. Stay tuned for more announcements in the next couple of months.

    You can have a look at what we’ve shipped thus far (custom roles for application registration management) here – https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/users-groups-roles/roles-custom-overview.

    Regards,
    Vince Smith
    Azure Active Directory Team

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  9. 1,278 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,888 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    51 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Lighthouse  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Lighthouse  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 79 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Lighthouse  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 42 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 78 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 129 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 2,169 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    284 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base