Omer

My feedback

  1. 294 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    38 comments  ·  Azure Synapse Analytics » SQL/Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Omer supported this idea  · 
  2. 105 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Omer supported this idea  · 
  3. 183 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  13 comments  ·  Networking » Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Omer commented  · 

    In cases where shared disk may be required, it's been found that it's easier to set up an Active / Passive failover instead of full high availability. i.e. similar to Traffic manager. If the primary service fails, we'd like to failover to a secondary server (utilising DFS etc.) which isn't ideal but is the best solution for some systems. (this should be very easy to implement)

    Omer supported this idea  · 
  4. 171 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  14 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Omer supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base