Razvan Socol

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Razvan Socol commented  · 

    Please disregard my previous comment. I only found out today that "Microsoft OLE DB Driver for SQL Server" should be used instead of "Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server", see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/connect/oledb/oledb-driver-for-sql-server.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Razvan Socol commented  · 

    Try selecting "Microsoft OLEDB Provider for SQL Server" instead of "Microsoft OLEDB Driver for SQL Server".

  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Razvan Socol commented  · 

    This problem still happens in SSMS 18.5.

    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  3. 54 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol shared this idea  · 
  6. 88 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 60

    <=-=Mar 29 2017 11:32PM=-=>

    Just wanted to add that both Oracle and DB2 seem to support this feature:

    http://docs.oracle.com/database/122/SQLRF/LAG.htm#SQLRF00652
    https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSGU8G_12.1.0/com.ibm.sqls.doc/ids_sqs_1513.htm

    Cheers,
    Itzik

    <=-=Apr 16 2017 10:08PM=-=>

    That last IBM link was for Informix!

    The DB2 link is https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_11.1.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.sql.ref.doc/doc/r0023461.html

    <=-=Jul 4 2017 3:30AM=-=>

    Thanks for reporting this request.
    It is in our backlog, and we have planned to do something like this, but we cannot confirm when it would be completed.

    Jovan

    <=-=Jul 10 2017 11:54AM=-=>

    Thanks, Jovan; good to hear.

    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  7. 420 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 8

    <=-=Mar 5 2017 2:42PM=-=>

    Thanks for this idea. This is a valid requirement and I hope that it will get more votes. Currently we cannot confirm when it will be added, but it is in our backlog.

    <=-=May 22 2017 5:03AM=-=>

    would like it very much, particularly since you already have the CONCAT / GREATEST() a variable number of paramenters and does something with it…

    <=-=Jun 5 2017 12:31PM=-=>

    GREATEST / LEAST functions would be fantastic addition.

    <=-=Nov 14 2017 3:42PM=-=>

    The workarounds using CROSS APPLY or CASE expressions are difficult to manage and read. I’d love to see these implemented.

    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol shared this idea  · 
  9. 386 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  10. 995 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    100 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  11. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Razvan Socol commented  · 

    The issue still appears in SSMS 18.2 (as well as in SSMS 17.9.1).

    Razvan Socol shared this idea  · 
  12. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  13. 43 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 577

    <=-=Dec 13 2007 3:33PM=-=>

    Dear Itzik.

    Thanks a lot for your feedback… and the strong voting support for this feature. Indeed, as you know, I am very much in favor of extending our functionality in this area. For a variety of reasons we did not get this into SQL Server 2008, but we are certainly looking into it for a future release.

    Keep the votes and comments coming…
    Michael

    PS: My apologies for the late official reply…

    <=-=Mar 10 2009 4:37PM=-=>

    I am a big fan of the ranking functions and partition by clause. I used them extensively. It was a fantastic inclusion in 2005. However, I can’t tell the number of times I wished DISTINCT worked with the count function. I can’t believe it wasn’t included in 2008!! So I’ve added my vote to get this in ASAP.

    <=-=Sep 15 2009 7:08AM=-=>

    yes this would be…

    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  14. 913 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  351 comments  ·  SQL Server  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  15. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  10 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  16. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 11

    <=-=Jul 15 2016 6:51AM=-=>

    I offer as evidence for the desire for this to happen, the 1k+ views of my stackoverflow question from 2011. A little under a person a day.

    http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/3828/is-there-a-collation-to-sort-the-following-strings-in-the-following-order-1-2-3?noredirect=1#comment273118_3828

    <=-=Jul 15 2016 8:40AM=-=>

    Adding to the link that Justin posted to his Stack Overflow question:

    http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/117379/sort-a-varchar-type-column
    http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/126744/order-by-and-comparison-of-mixed-strings-of-letters-and-numbers

    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34509/natural-human-alpha-numeric-sort-in-microsoft-sql-2005
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3158917/natural-sort-for-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22461619/complex-sort-of-field-string-number-string
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24989365/sorting-a-string-numerically-in-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26552435/sorting-mixed-numbers-and-letters
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26932310/sql-server-string-convert-numeric-and-sorting-issue
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28278467/sort-dropdown-list-in-alpha-numeric-order
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28372359/natural-sort-for-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29676432/alphanumeric-sort
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30502118/sort-float-numbers-as-a-natural-numbers-in-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35001818/alphanumeric-and-numeric-sorting-in-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37728476/sql-sorting-numeric-and-string

    http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/51602/How-to-Sort-Alphanumeric-Data-in-SQL

    <=-=Mar 3 2017 1:02PM=-=>

    We understand the scenario and if it gets more votes we will consider it for the next releases. It is assigned to our collation & string processing team.

    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  17. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 258

    <=-=Apr 6 2008 6:30PM=-=>

    Hi Erland,

    Thank you for your suggestion. We will investigate a solution for a future version of SQL Server (post 2008).

    Il-Sung Lee.

    <=-=Jun 11 2010 12:51PM=-=>

    Surely a change could also be made to SSMS as well? When it parses master.sys.databases it could conceivably filter those results. Whilst not a foolproof method, at least it would work as a quick temporary solution (considering this was posted 3 yrs ago).

    <=-=Sep 23 2010 4:12PM=-=>

    The problem with changing SSMS is that it doesn’t strictly fix the issue as anyone who is determined to discover the other databases would just directly query the server metadata. As such, I think we need to investigate a solution this for all cases, not just SSMS.

    Il-Sung.

    <=-=Aug 3 2011 7:12AM=-=>

    Has there been any new development for this suggestion? As an organization, we’d like to see this…

    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  18. 93 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  4 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  19. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 2

    <=-=Apr 30 2008 4:25PM=-=>

    Dear customer,

    Thank you for reporting this issue. You are right about the problem. In SQL Server 2005, we made changes to “compute scalar” operator. As a result, “computer scalar” operator does not have runtime information about actual rows any more. Please see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178082.aspx. That’s also why in the stats profile, you got 0 actual rows for “compute scalar”. We agree that this is confusing. We are working on this issue.

    Thanks,
    Leo Huang
    SQL Server Relational Engine Team

    <=-=Feb 1 2012 11:56AM=-=>

    Hello,

    Thank you for submitting this feedback, but given its priority relative to the many other items in our queue, it is unlikely that we will actually complete it. As such, we are closing this feedback as �won�t fix�. If you feel that this is worth reconsidering, feel free to respond to this message and we will take another look.

    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
  20. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 10

    <=-=Aug 11 2008 12:23PM=-=>

    Dear Customer,
    Thanks for your feedback. QUERYTRACEON was originally used for testing purposes and was not intended to be published. Although we agree that it would be useful to customers, for the time being we cannot recommend its usage. We did a thorough analysis of the current implementation and functionality of QUERYTRACEON and eventually decided that we cannot fully guarantee its reliability and consistency and therefore cannot recommend to use it. Moreover, the implications of toggling global (per server) and local (per session) trace flags on a per-query basis are not straightforward and add to the complexity of this switch. The entire issue came up late in the release cycle of SQL Server 2008 and did not meet the bar anymore, so we had to postpone the documentation to the next release.
    With best regards,
    Roman Schindlauer

    <=-=Apr 14 2013 3:41PM=-=>

    Some information on …

    Razvan Socol supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base