Matthias Vill

My feedback

  1. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  2. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  4 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  5. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 10

    <=-=Apr 10 2017 4:40AM=-=>

    Thanks for the feedback. We agree with your proposal and this request is in our backlog. We will let people to vote for this. Also feel free to report any other option that you find useful. Note that we cannot commit when this request ill be implemented, because it depends on the number of votes and schedule.

    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 4

    <=-=Dec 4 2016 5:14PM=-=>

    Just to be clear – this is different than the fixed bug 1051306, which was about only showing the current query. (Now it just only shows the first.)

    <=-=Apr 26 2017 2:29PM=-=>

    This isn’t fixed in 14.0.17099.0 (the new SQL Server Management Studio 17 that went out today.)

    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  7. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  8. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  9. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  10. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 6

    <=-=Mar 3 2017 2:00PM=-=>

    We are aware that this is important missing feature; however, we have no plans to add this in the near future. We will keep this request in backlog to see how many votes will get.

    <=-=Jul 1 2017 7:03PM=-=>

    Can’t even remember how many times I’ve wished to have this in SQL server.

    If you want to get a somewhat realistic feel of how talked about this feature really is, you can check out the number of votes and more importantly views that this StackOverflow question has:

    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732613/how-to-declare-array-inside-sql-server-stored-procedure

    Unfortunately, not many people visit this website and participate in voting here so it’s not a reliable indicator of how much any particular feature is requested. Please consider moving to UserVoice. Visual Studio UserVoice for example has loads more activity.

    <=-=Jul 1 2017 11:17PM=-=>

    We totally understand that t-sql as a language itself is desigened to…

    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  11. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  12. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 11

    <=-=Jul 15 2016 6:51AM=-=>

    I offer as evidence for the desire for this to happen, the 1k+ views of my stackoverflow question from 2011. A little under a person a day.

    http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/3828/is-there-a-collation-to-sort-the-following-strings-in-the-following-order-1-2-3?noredirect=1#comment273118_3828

    <=-=Jul 15 2016 8:40AM=-=>

    Adding to the link that Justin posted to his Stack Overflow question:

    http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/117379/sort-a-varchar-type-column
    http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/126744/order-by-and-comparison-of-mixed-strings-of-letters-and-numbers

    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34509/natural-human-alpha-numeric-sort-in-microsoft-sql-2005
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3158917/natural-sort-for-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22461619/complex-sort-of-field-string-number-string
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24989365/sorting-a-string-numerically-in-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26552435/sorting-mixed-numbers-and-letters
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26932310/sql-server-string-convert-numeric-and-sorting-issue
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28278467/sort-dropdown-list-in-alpha-numeric-order
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28372359/natural-sort-for-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29676432/alphanumeric-sort
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30502118/sort-float-numbers-as-a-natural-numbers-in-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35001818/alphanumeric-and-numeric-sorting-in-sql-server
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37728476/sql-sorting-numeric-and-string

    http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/51602/How-to-Sort-Alphanumeric-Data-in-SQL

    <=-=Mar 3 2017 1:02PM=-=>

    We understand the scenario and if it gets more votes we will consider it for the next releases. It is assigned to our collation & string processing team.

    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  13. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  14. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  15. 47 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  16. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  SQL Server » Setup + Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matthias Vill commented  · 

    And SQL Server 2019 installer should detect Java 11 as Java 8 is soon end of support

    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  17. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 3

    <=-=May 27 2017 6:38AM=-=>

    Thank you for taking the time to post this issue! We understand that this could be an important performance improvement.
    Performance tuning is of such scenarios is not a trivial task. Change of such feature as Query Store can speed up one scenario and lead to degradation in others. We�ll look more into this particular use case and see what we can do.

    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  18. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  19. 51 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 25

    <=-=Feb 7 2017 7:34PM=-=>

    Yes! I myself a use heavily inline table value functions and that would improve the clarity of their use even more!

    <=-=Mar 5 2017 2:48PM=-=>

    We understand the requirement, and it is good that it gets a lot of votes in very short period. It is in out backlog and we will consider it for some of the next releases; however, currently we cannot confirm when it will be implemented..

    <=-=Dec 22 2017 3:17PM=-=>

    This would be quite incredibly useful. When it was added to C#, it was a “so-what?” thing for me at the time – but now, I don’t know how I ever coded without named parameters. It has saved me countless hours getting things right the first time, and not chasing around dumb problems. I am sure the same would be true if SQL Server supported named parameters in User-Defined Functions.…

    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
  20. 66 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 54

    <=-=Sep 4 2007 12:29PM=-=>

    If this is considered for a future version of SQL Server, please implement it according to the ISO SQL standard. In other words, implement the SQL Standard , which provides regular expression support through the operator [NOT] SIMILAR TO, which in the standard remains separate from LIKE.

    <=-=Sep 5 2007 7:05AM=-=>

    Like Steve, I would also like to stress that any implementation should be as per ANSI (SIMILAR predicate). The CLR functionality is not a relevant design consideration.

    <=-=Oct 15 2007 8:43AM=-=>

    This is a request we’ve heard a lot, and it’s of obvious value. I can’t promise when we’ll get to it—-it’s doubtful for this release—-but this is certainly on our radar.

    Cheers,
    -Isaac

    <=-=Mar 24 2010 2:54PM=-=>

    Hi,
    I have resolved this request as duplicate of feedback item below:

    https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/261342/regex-functionality-in-pattern-matching?wa=wsignin1.0


    Umachandar, SQL Programmability Team

    <=-=Mar 24 2010…
    Matthias Vill supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base