Toshiyuki Hara

My feedback

  1. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  2. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Quick update here – with the announcement of the premium plan we do support moving from consumption to a premium plan. Today this may not work for all consumption apps in a region only because some consumption apps may exist in a “webspace” that doesn’t yet have premium turned on. That said we have CLI commands rolling out in the next few weeks to make this seamless.

    Moving to app service plan is a bit trickier as the actual code often lives in a different place on an app service plan (app service local storage) than where consumption needs them (azure storage files) – so moving may not work and currently don’t have any immediate plans to do like “code migration” in addition to changing plans.

    You can see a sample of moving plans between apps in this sample here as well: https://github.com/Azure-Samples/functions-csharp-premium-scaler

    -
    Jeff

    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  3. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  4. 42 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  5. 95 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  6. 78 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  7. 213 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  8. 2,269 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    75 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of static website hosting for Azure Storage to enable this scenario. Check out the blog post here for more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-storage-static-web-hosting-public-preview. The feature set includes support for default documents and custom error documents for HTTP status code 404.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  9. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Container Registry  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We made some progress here with some meta-data attributes to store the readme contents. And, some portal work to display it.
    Unfortunately, this got prioritized as we had more pressing/blocking work. We love this polish, and are working with the OCI Image and Distribution specs to define common APIs that all OCI Distribtuion implementations would support. This would enable the community to build tools around this scenario, and not limit to just us.
    That said, we still want to enable this scenario, just had to move it back to the backlog.
    For more info on how we prioritize:
    https://aka.ms/acr/roadmap
    Apologies,
    Steve

    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  10. 108 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure Container Registry  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  11. 54 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  12. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  13. 51 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) » Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  14. 401 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  15. 53 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Container Instances  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  16. 1,473 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    41 comments  ·  Azure Search » Pricing and Quotas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  17. 143 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Search » Multi-tenancy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  18. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara shared this idea  · 
  19. 1,121 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 
  20. 1,591 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    168 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Toshiyuki Hara supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base