Richard Diphoorn

My feedback

  1. 256 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Diphoorn supported this idea  · 
  2. 132 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  20 comments  ·  Azure Governance » Azure Policy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Diphoorn commented  · 

    Is there an update on this feature request?

    Richard Diphoorn supported this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Diphoorn supported this idea  · 
  4. 149 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » End user experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Richard Diphoorn supported this idea  · 
  5. 158 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Just to confirm the request, this is around having the complete SMA experience for tenants, correct? Should tenants be allowed to author their own runbooks? Or are you looking to have the admin provide runbook content for the tenants so that they can run and schedule approved runbooks?

    Richard Diphoorn supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base