MikeN

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Database for MySQL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MikeN shared this idea  · 
  2. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    I agree that this is needed. Every time you run a query you need to remove all the columns that are not relevant. You should be able to save the column selection along with the query so it returns the data that you are looking for.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MikeN shared this idea  · 
  4. 283 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    This is definitely needed. Many environments have a security requirement that all traffic must route through a next generation firewall virtual appliance.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  5. 51 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Certificates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    I agree, exporting a private key without a passphrase is a security risk.

    Customers can easily add a passphrase after the fact with OpenSSL.
    Surely Microsoft can build that in to the export process before presenting the download.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  6. 4,517 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    192 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    Is there any update from the product team on if this is in the roadmap for 2020?

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  7. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Container Registry  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    I agree with this suggestion. The current retention policy only works for untagged images. This is not ideal. Ideally we'd want to configure ACR to delete any images that were pushed older than a defined number of days ago.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  8. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Cache » Azure Redis Cache  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    I agree with this. "Conflict" is not useful at all. The error should minimally say something along the lines of "Missing NSG Rule" or ideally give more detail on specifically what allowed ports are missing within the NSG rule.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  9. 550 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    37 comments  ·  Cache » Azure Redis Cache  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    Agreed that this is ridiculously slow. This is my first time deploying this and i've been waiting over 55 minutes in US East.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Security Center  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MikeN shared this idea  · 
  11. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MikeN shared this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.

    MikeN shared this idea  · 
  13. 1,072 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Networking » Bastion  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  14. 422 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have raised the limit to 100 recently. We are regularly reviewing the limits and will continue to look for opportunities to raise the limits even further. If you have scenarios requiring limits higher than what is supported, please add your scenario details here (if you are comfortable with that) or raise an issue with Azure support and we will get back to you.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    100 is a step in the right direction, however honestly there should be no limits at all. It should be up to your customers and their workload as to how many sites should be published behind application gateway. Most websites require a total of 4 listeners. domain.com (HTTP) domain.com (HTTPS), www.domain.com (HTTP), www.domain.com (HTTPS). The HTTP listeners are just a redirect to HTTPS and they are not really used. It doesn't make sense to be limited to only publishing 25 websites if they are mostly idle and in turn you're not even coming close to maxing out the performance capabilities of the app gateway.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    I agree with this. Given that most sites will require a HTTP listener to redirect to HTTPS, this limits you to only publishing 10 sites behind each application gateway. If your sites are relatively low traffic, this is a waste of resources to have many application gateways that are mostly idle. There should be no limit on this and it should be up to administrators to decide how many application gateways are needed to support the workload.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  15. 100 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    +1 for this. Many organizations are using a 3rd party virtual security appliance and all inbound traffic must go through the security appliance due to security requirements. This makes V2 of the application gateway useless. It would be beneficial to be able to use V2 so you can terminate TLS at the app gateway and still do HSTS.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  16. 153 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Support Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    I agree. Support doesn't even listen when you add a message saying that the ticket can be closed, they try to follow up anyway. It seems Microsoft likes to waste money by having their employees needlessly respond to tickets that can be closed.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  17. 69 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MikeN supported this idea  · 
  18. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MikeN shared this idea  · 
  19. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Conditional Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MikeN supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    This is now available in Preview for Windows computers, it requires a registry edit on the client side to enable it. Still no support for controlling the OneDrive Sync client via conditoinal access for MacOS. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/onedrive/enable-conditional-access

  20. 1,242 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MikeN commented  · 

    It would be good for the Azure AD team to provide an official update on this. Some users are stating that "Authentication Administrator" works, others say it does not.

    MikeN supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base