Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 442 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    unplanned  ·  11 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Absolutely need this. I would prefer even more that that sql server and database had the same quota instead of 21 servers and 5000 databases per server. With the push towards app-centric infrastructure with PaaS, This is a gaping issue. The other issue would this would be that $15/mo extra per server for sql auditing would need to go away.

    If we can't have those things then we need to at least be able to put databases in separate resource groups from the servers.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base