Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 318 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    64 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Just to provide an update, we are close to launching a private preview. We are in the final testing stages for this feature. We will have another update in the next few weeks with instructions on how to join the private preview.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Monitor-Application Insights » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 7,663 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    197 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,483 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    154 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Wow, closed after 4 years, and with thousands of votes!

    Surely resource groups are identified internally by something like a GUID?

    At the very least, couldn't you have a 'rename' feature that behind the scenes just creates a new group, moves resources to it, then deletes the old one?

  5. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Search » Crawlers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Database for PostgreSQL » Extension  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 91 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 90 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This request is for custom domain and custom SSL certificate support for the IoT Hub endpoint. This work is currently unplanned for IoT Hub but we’re listing to customer requests and may chose to support this in the future.

    If you have interest in have a deterministic way of understanding your IoT Hub IP address (and corresponding geo-pair IP address) in order to keep firewall rules up-to-date, see and vote on this request: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/321918-azure-iot/suggestions/15714243-iot-hub-network-address instead.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Symmetric key attestation appears to be available in the `preview_provisioningServiceV2` branch on GitHub, but it's yet available as a preview package on Nuget

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cost Management » Cost analysis  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Database for PostgreSQL » Extension  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Database for PostgreSQL » Extension  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 182 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  7 comments  ·  Batch  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This has been under review for a long time - are there any updates on this?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 196 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    One option for this is to use a different schema for each environment, so you can have more than one environment running on a single SQL Database, which saves money.

    For example, you can have all your non-Production environments (dev, test, QA) on a single database, with a schema for each, and your Production environment in a database on its own.

  15. 98 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Application Proxy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’ve hit some roadblocks in our design for this feature and will need to re-evaluate options. To help us validate the scenarios we need to address, please continue to share feedback. We will update in the next couple months once we have a better idea of our timeline and approach.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base